Yang Jiming,Cheng Hang,Ma Min,et al.Dosimetric comparison between conventional IMRT and EBCRT combined with IMRT for post-mastectomy left-sided breast cancer patients[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2022,42(4):262-268
Dosimetric comparison between conventional IMRT and EBCRT combined with IMRT for post-mastectomy left-sided breast cancer patients
Received:December 09, 2021  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20211209-00477
KeyWords:Breast cancer|Post-mastectomy|Electron beam conformal radiotherapy|Intensity modulated radiotherapy|Dosimetry
FundProject:余姚市医疗卫生科技计划平台项目(2021YPT02)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Yang Jiming Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Center, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China  
Cheng Hang Radiotherapy Technology Department, Yuyao People's Hospital, Ningbo 315400, China  
Ma Min Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Scicences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China  
Zhang Weichao Radiotherapy Department, Huaxian People's Hospital of Henan, Anyang 456400, China  
Wu Yong Radiotherapy Department, Xingyi People's Hospital, Xingyi 562400, China  
Ren Jiangping Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Center, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China  
Guo Jianxin Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Center, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China gjx1696@yeah.net 
Hits: 4575
Download times: 1504
Abstract::
      Objective To investigate the dosimetric differences between conventional IMRT and electron beam conformal radiotherapy (EBCRT) combined with IMRT for post-mastectomy left-sided breast cancer patients.Methods A total of 20 post-mastectomy left-sided breast cancer patients who were treated in the Ningbo First Hospital from June 2018 to October 2021 were retrospectively studied. The planning target volume (PTV) included the supra-and infra-clavicular regions(PTVsc) and the ipsilateral chest wall (PTVcw), and the prescribed dose was 50 Gy/25 f. All radiotherapy plans were designed using the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). After that, the dose distribution of the target volume and the dose exposure of organs at risk (OARs) were compared and analyzed.Results All the IMRT plans met the clinical requirements, yet 2/20 of the EBCRT combined with IMRT plans were not clinically accepted. For these two patients, the maximum chest wall thickness was 3.7 cm and 4.4 cm each, and the designed electron beam energy was 12 MeV and 15 MeV, respectively. The dose to the ipsilateral lung of these two patients exceeded the institution-specific dose limit standard. For the remaining 18 patients whose chest wall thickness was 3 cm or less, the designed electron beams were 9 MeV or less. All the EBCRT combined with IMRT plans were clinically accepted. The target dose distribution of the conventional IMRT was better than that of the EBCRT combined with IMRT (uniformity index (HI):PTVsc:t=-10.20, P<0.05; PTVcw:t=-9.24, P<0.05; conformal index (CI):PTVall:t=10.39, P <0.05). For OARs, the V5 Gy, V20 Gy, and Dmean of the ipsilateral lung of EBCRT combined with IMRT were lower than those of IMRT (t=5.98, 6.30, 11.30, P <0.05). Specifically, the V25 Gy and Dmean of heart decreased by 8.3% and 4.79 Gy, respectively (t=15.23, 15.76, P<0.05), the Dmean of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) decreased by 44.03% (t=11.69, P <0.05), and the V5 Gy and Dmean of the contralateral breast decreased by 7.9% and 0.8 Gy, respectively (t=3.66, 4.93, P<0.05). The dosimetric differences of other OARs were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).Conclusions For post-mastectomy left-sided breast cancer patients with a chest wall thickness of less than 3 cm, EBCRT combined IMRT can significantly reduce the exposure dose to the heart, the ipsilateral lung, and the contralateral breast, which is beneficial to reducing the potential risk of long-term complications after radiotherapy and can further improve the long-term overall survival rate of patients. For patients with thick chest wall, IMRT plans are more technologically ideal.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:12034946  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=8400690B225D0A440FF4B0AFFBF4835C6B7112631B574832C9C7E09AC84C30E9D153CE41D2479F65F9172D86B57B16E3833F464BA073A702A099C57ADC3D5EA1DF397247243EB9422F40865C74B7EDC0544770569804FA7FE64CF6842EE6FB31F98F529A5D55901DB5EA01DD041430E493BDF24F8FDDC9057C4E8D48EA0513852B1848BEC3D2D7C4&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=885CEFEC57DA488F&aid=2D57B55F09E69D01510D976E1B0A6B04&vid=&iid=E158A972A605785F&sid=30897FA31CA3354D&eid=DC330B09A33F1455&fileno=20220404&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="885CEFEC57DA488F"; var my_aid="2D57B55F09E69D01510D976E1B0A6B04";