Wang Junna,Wang Shiwei,Xu Zhichao,et al.Application value of the two estimation methods in evaluating the radiation dose of adult chest CT[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2019,39(9):711-714
Application value of the two estimation methods in evaluating the radiation dose of adult chest CT
Received:January 28, 2019  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2019.09.014
KeyWords:Radiation dose  Chest  CT  Size-specific dose estimate
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Wang Junna Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, China  
Wang Shiwei Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, China 2474721554@qq.com 
Xu Zhichao Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, China  
Ling Dongya Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, China  
Bu Yangyang Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, China  
Hits: 4561
Download times: 1937
Abstract::
      Objective To investigate the application value of CTDIvol and size-specific dose estimate(SSDE) in evaluating the radiation dose of adult chest CT. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the CTDIvol and SSDE of 128 patients who underwent chest CT scanning in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from March to April 2017 and all images are adequate for diagnosis. The subjects were divided into three groups according to body mass index (BMI):Group A,38 cases with 16 ≤ BMI<21.1 kg/m2; Group B,53 cases with 21.1 ≤ BMI<23.9 kg/m2; Group C,37 cases with 23.9 ≤ BMI<34.1 kg/m2. The diameters of anterior-posterior (AP) and left-right (LAT) of each patient were measured in the slice of nipple level, and CTDIvol, effective diameter (ED), conversion factor (fsize) and SSDE of each patient were recorded and calculated. Meanwhile, the differences between CTDIvol and SSDE in different BMI groups were compared. Results SSDE of each group was higher than CTDIvol, and increased by 50.13%, 42.83% and 33.68% in group A, B and C, respectively. There were significant differences in radiation dose between CTDIvol and SSDE in the three groups (t=-48.873, -57.001, -32.651, P<0.05). There were significant differences in ED, fsize, CTDIvol and SSDE among the three groups (F=51.456, 47.749, 113.916, 106.449, P<0.05). Conclusions SSDE can evaluate the radiation dose absorbed by patients with different body types in chest CT, while CTDIvol underestimated the radiation dose.The lower BMI, the greater the underestimated dose value, the more radiation dose absorbed.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:12030136  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=DCA5CABA83612A94F0F16D09AE51DD0E549EB20E69A1198CF529C876809EDF00D75F8671B152F65FA4B2604607B60511B3FD16237AD8169B4AD8F98B92AED38B9E3249335F03D1DB8E954302049D4F282BBEDAB9CCE35A0D178F37F3A12E19C1367969B2ADA90E78&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=B6351343F4791CA3&aid=7BA62EAAEF4CF3CAA82B7DC5BF7B43E9&vid=&iid=9CF7A0430CBB2DFD&sid=FD6137FFCE59D193&eid=C4B91B15F1F73E7E&fileno=20190914&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="B6351343F4791CA3"; var my_aid="7BA62EAAEF4CF3CAA82B7DC5BF7B43E9";