Shi Liming,Shan Jingjing,Sun Xiaonan.Tumor pathological response and downstaging of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy:comparison of two radiation dose schedules[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2017,37(12):915-918,932
Tumor pathological response and downstaging of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy:comparison of two radiation dose schedules
Received:May 08, 2017  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2017.12.007
KeyWords:Rectal cancer  Neoadjuvant therapy  Chemoradiotherapy  Dose fractionation
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Shi Liming Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310019, China  
Shan Jingjing Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310019, China  
Sun Xiaonan Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310019, China sunxiaonan@zju.edu.cn 
Hits: 2722
Download times: 1722
Abstract::
      Objective To assess the short-term efficacy and tolerability of different radiotherapy doses schedules as 46 Gy and 50 Gy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods All patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy between Aug 2010 and May 2015 were enrolled. This retrospective analysis was performed according to the radiotherapy dose grouping of 46 Gy and 50 Gy groups. Concurrent chemotherapy regimen was capecitabine-based and oxaliplatin was added only when young patients (<75 years old) were in a good condition. Total mesorector excision was scheduled 6-8 weeks after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Results Totally 213 patients were enrolled in our analysis, including 61 cases in 46 Gy group and 152 cases in 50 Gy group. There were 145 male and 68 female patients. There were 22 patients diagnosed clinically with T2, 180 with T3, and 11 with T4. Tumor distance from the anal verge was ≤ 5, >5 and <10 cm, or ≥ 10 cm in 82, 115 and 16 patients, respectively. T downstaging was observed in 95 (44.6%) patients, pathologic complete response (PCR) was shown in 48 (22.5%) patients. In the 46 Gy and 50 Gy groups, the rate of PCR was 18.0% vs.24.3% (P>0.05). In addition, good response rate (TRG 3+4) was 67.2% vs. 75.0% (P>0.05), and T downstaging rate was 39.3% vs. 46.7% (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis for T3N2/T4 patients, the rate of PCR was 6.3% vs. 23.3% (P>0.05), good response rate (TRG 3+4) was 50.0% vs. 72.1% (P>0.05), and T downstaging was 31.3% vs. 46.5% (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in treatment-related toxicity between the two groups. Conclusions The two different radiation dose fractionation (50 Gy vs. 46 Gy) had no impact on pathologic tumor regression and T downstaging for locally advanced rectal cancer. Nonetheless, a further long-term follow-up is warranted to confirm the preliminary study.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9069153  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=61E8D2493583F1D29D7859DFEE865F98CE6A2D5ACA0C420F4A79AB014A74B3571851D239444A037567FFC5E688E2E9AF7D4E177D98A985866031438000A063E26EC502E6E96E630CC2545AA3CFD93B554EA59A343EB6BEFFB9CAC294F5C1683219FC9A1714C31130DD5B29454F7D165F61D29666D24361E234A11CF31BA80A1DB98D6DB04B32C118046E3D4F328ECBCF7AA6000C8D209883D67FE0A66EED2FF9&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=FA004A8A4ED1540B&aid=58EC03D86D1FF9207AE0CB2143EBD2FF&vid=&iid=59906B3B2830C2C5&sid=BD77137A0285B6FF&eid=8FED0B1E1C3C72D6&fileno=20171207&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="FA004A8A4ED1540B"; var my_aid="58EC03D86D1FF9207AE0CB2143EBD2FF";