| Wang Zhiting,Cao Guoquan,Miao Miao,et al.The effect of the bedside protection against different operators in percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2015,35(9):709-712 |
| The effect of the bedside protection against different operators in percutaneous coronary intervention |
| Received:March 03, 2015 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2015.09.018 |
| KeyWords:Percutaneous coronary Intervention Incident dose rate Radiation protection |
| FundProject: |
| Author Name | Affiliation | E-mail | | Wang Zhiting | Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China | | | Cao Guoquan | Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China | | | Miao Miao | Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China | | | Huang Weijian | Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China | | | Huang Zhouqing | Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China | susiehzq@126.com |
|
| Hits: 5076 |
| Download times: 3452 |
| Abstract:: |
| Objective To discuss the effect of the bedside shielding protection on the first and second operators against position radiation in percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods The surface entrance dosage rate for the first and second operators at 125 cm height with and without radiation protection shielding (provided separately) were measured. The t-test was used for statistical analysis of arithmetic mean values of dosage rates. And the effect of bedside shielding protection was calculated. Results The position radiation dosage rate at which the first operator exposed was significantly higher than that for the second in the case of no bedside protection (t=97.1-2 263.0, P<0.05), whereas the dosage rate at which the first operator (except for the left foot position) exposed was significantly lower than that for the second in the case of no bedside protection (t=-80.9-275.1, P<0.05). The shielding effect of bedside protection on the first and second operators was in the range of 92.26%-99.36% and 27.83%-97.90%, respectively. Conclusions The bedside protection may effectively reduce position radiation dose to patients and the use of bedside protection changed the trends in the dose distribution in operators' standing region. Attention should be focused on the radiation protection of the second operators in daily work by making full use of bedside protection. |
| HTML View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
