| 郑君瑶,郑梦,王燕,等.卡格列净通过抑制近端肾小管摄取核素偶联药物发挥肾保护作用的研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2026,46(8):749-754.Zheng Junyao,Zheng Meng,Wang Yan,et al.Renoprotective effect of canagliflozin by inhibiting the uptake of radionuclide drug conjugates in the renal proximal tubule[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2026,46(8):749-754 |
| 卡格列净通过抑制近端肾小管摄取核素偶联药物发挥肾保护作用的研究 |
| Renoprotective effect of canagliflozin by inhibiting the uptake of radionuclide drug conjugates in the renal proximal tubule |
| 投稿时间:2025-09-16 |
| DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20250916-00333 |
| 中文关键词: 放射性肾损伤|肾保护剂|核素偶联药物|卡格列净|177Lu-TFR1 |
| 英文关键词:Radiation-induced nephropathy|Renoprotective agent|Radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs)|Canagliflozin (CANA)|177Lu-TFR1 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(U24A20765);苏州市基础研究试点项目(SSD2024097) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2900 |
| 全文下载次数: 14 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 评估卡格列净(CANA)对核素偶联药物(RDCs)所致肾损伤的保护作用及其潜在机制。方法 以本课题组自主研制的177Lu-转铁蛋白受体1(TFR1)为工具药,CCK-8实验检测CANA联合177Lu-TFR1对肾小管上皮细胞系HK-2和人结直肠癌细胞HT-29细胞活力的影响,细胞摄取实验检测CANA对HT-29细胞和HK-2细胞摄取177Lu-TFR1的影响;动物实验将小鼠按体重排序,分层随机法分为对照组、CANA组、177Lu-TFR1组和177Lu-TFR1+CANA组,每组3只。CANA以20 mg·kg-1·d-1的剂量给小鼠灌胃,在灌胃第7天从小鼠尾静脉注射3.7×107 Bq/只剂量的177Lu-TFR1,Phoenix WinNonLin 6.4计算177Lu-TFR1的药物代谢动力学参数(半衰期T1/2,曲线下面积),γ计数检测并计算小鼠给药后4和72 h各组织放射性摄取值(%ID/g),收集各组给药后1、3、7、28 d血清和尿液,检测血肌酐和尿蛋白,同时将各组给药后第28天的肾脏进行HE染色,并进行组织病理学评分。结果 177Lu-TFR1组HK-2细胞抑制率显著高于177Lu-TFR1+CANA组(t = 5.66、7.18、11.57,P <0.001),联合应用CANA并未对177Lu-TFR1抑制肿瘤细胞增殖的效果产生负面影响;给药后24、48和72 h,与177Lu-TFR1组相比,177Lu-TFR1+CANA组HK-2细胞对177Lu-TFR1的放射性摄取减少(t = 5.92、4.30、2.69,P <0.05),而两组HT-29细胞对177Lu-TFR1的放射性摄取差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。给药后4和72 h,177Lu-TFR1+CANA组小鼠肾脏的放射性摄取值均低于177Lu-TFR1组(t = 11.09、3.28,P <0.05);给药后第28天,177Lu-TFR1+CANA组小鼠尿蛋白和肾脏组织病理学评分均低于177Lu-TFR1组(t = 7.72、18.00,P <0.001)。结论 CANA通过减少近端肾小管上皮细胞对177Lu-TFR1的摄取,在177Lu-TFR1治疗肿瘤过程中发挥了肾保护作用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To evaluate the renoprotective effect of canagliflozin (CANA) against kidney injury caused by radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs), in order to explore potential mechanisms. Methods 177Lu-TFR1, an investigational drug independently developed by the authors'team, was used as a tool drug in this study. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was conducted to detect the effects of CANA combined with 177Lu-TFR1 on the viability of renal tubular epithelial cell line HK-2 and human colorectal carcinoma cell line HT-29. Meanwhile, cell uptake experiments were carried out to explore the effects of CANA on the uptake of 177Lu-TFR1 in HT-29 and HK-2 cell lines. Mice were divided into four different groups (n = 3) according to body weight using stratified randomization: the control, CANA, 177Lu-TFR1, and 177Lu-TFR1 + CANA groups. CANA was administered to mice via gavage at a dosage of 20 mg·kg-1·d-1. At 7 d post-gavage, 177Lu-TFR1 was injected into the tail vein of the mice at a dose of 3.7×107 Bq per mouse. The pharmacokinetic parameters of 177Lu-TFR1, including half-life (T1/2) and area under the curve (AUC), were calculated using the Phoenix WinNonLin software (version 6.4). The radioactive uptake (%ID/g) in various tissues at 4 and 72 h post-administration was detected and calculated using γ counting. The serum and urine of mice in various groups were collected at 1, 3, 7, and 28 d post-administration to detect serum creatinine and urine protein. At 28 d post-administration, the kidneys of mice in various groups were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, followed by histopathological scoring. Results The 177Lu-TFR1 group exhibited significantly higher inhibitory rates of the HK-2 cell line than the 177Lu-TFR1 + CANA group (t = 5.66, 7.18, 11.57, P < 0.001), which indicated that the combined application of CANA exerted a nominal negative impact on the role of 177Lu-TFR1 in inhibiting tumor cell proliferation. At 24, 48, and 72 h post-administration, the 177Lu-TFR1 + CANA group exhibited reduced radioactive uptake of 177Lu-TFR1 in the HK-2 cell line compared to the 177Lu-TFR1 group (t = 5.92, 4.30, 2.69, P < 0.05), but no statistically significant difference in the radioactive uptake of 177Lu-TFR1 in the HT-29 cell line was observed between both groups(P>0.05). At 4 and 72 h post-administration, the 177Lu-TFR1 + CANA group showed lower radioactive uptake in the kidney than the 177Lu-TFR1 group (t = 11.09, 3.28, P < 0.05). At 28 d post-administration, the urine protein levels and renal histopathological scores of the 177Lu-TFR1 + CANA group were both lower than those of the 177Lu-TFR1 group (t = 7.72, 18.00, P < 0.001). Conclusions In the treatment of tumors using 177Lu-TFR1, CANA plays a renoprotective role by reducing the uptake of 177Lu-TFR1 in renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. |
| HTML 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|