| Sun Yanze,Qian Jianjun,Tian Ye.Current situation investigation on the standardization of physical dose description in radiobiology researches in China[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2022,42(10):812-816 |
| Current situation investigation on the standardization of physical dose description in radiobiology researches in China |
| Received:July 08, 2022 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20220708-00283 |
| KeyWords:Radiobiology Physical dosimetry Reproducibility Normalization |
| FundProject:苏州市放射治疗学临床医学中心项目(Szlcyxzx202103) |
| Author Name | Affiliation | E-mail | | Sun Yanze | Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou Key Laboratory of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Suzhou 215004, China | | | Qian Jianjun | Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou Key Laboratory of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Suzhou 215004, China | qianjianjun0628@aliyun.com | | Tian Ye | Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou Key Laboratory of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Suzhou 215004, China | |
|
| Hits: 1259 |
| Download times: 507 |
| Abstract:: |
| Objective To understand the normative status of physical dose description in domestic radiobiology studies through literature study.Methods According to the scoring system recommended by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Desrosiers et al, evaluate (full Score: 10 points) the normalization of physical dosimetry description in the radiobiology-related articles published in two important journals, Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology and Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, in past 5 years.Results A total of 222 relevant articles from these two journals were included, and a median score of 5.0 was evaluated. Among them, 72.1% of the literatures scored 4.0-7.0 points, 68.0% of the literatures scored ≤5.5 points, and 18.5% scored ≤3.0 points. 90.1% and 97.7% of the literatures described "the type of ray" and "absorbed dose", with the highest average score (0.90 and 0.98 points) respectively. The lowest average score of "dosimetry calibration" was 0 point. Conclusions Although the most of literatures described "the type of ray" and "absorbed dose", most other details of dosimetric parameters were not reported. Therefore, there is a deficiency in the standardized description of physical dosimetry in domestic radiobiology literatures, which may affect the reproducibility and interpretability of research result. |
| HTML View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
