Liu Xiaoyu,Zhang Changying,Zheng Jie,Yu Zhiming,Wang Ruxing.Comparison of fluoroscopy exposure between HIS bundle pacing and conventional pacing during procedures[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2020,40(11):877-881
Comparison of fluoroscopy exposure between HIS bundle pacing and conventional pacing during procedures
Received:December 18, 2019  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2020.11.012
KeyWords:HIS Bundle  Pacing  Cardiovascular intervention  Dose  Patient
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Liu Xiaoyu Department of Candiology, Wuxi People's Hospital, 214023, China  
Zhang Changying Department of Candiology, Wuxi People's Hospital, 214023, China  
Zheng Jie Department of Candiology, Wuxi People's Hospital, 214023, China  
Yu Zhiming Department of Candiology, Wuxi People's Hospital, 214023, China  
Wang Ruxing Department of Candiology, Wuxi People's Hospital, 214023, China ruxingw@aliyun.com 
Hits: 1479
Download times: 932
Abstract::
      Objective To compare the differences of fluoroscopy time and dose between HIS bundle pacing and right ventricle apex pacing. Methods This study includes thirty patients undergoing HIS bundle pacing (HIS group) and 32 patients undergoing right ventricular apex pacing (RVA group). The fluoroscopy time and cumulative dose (CD) to patients during surgery were recorded and analyzed. Results The operation time for patients in HIS group and RVA group were (76.8±13.1) and (66.0±10.8) min (t=3.386, P<0.001), respectively. The fluoroscopy time was (698.2±113.7) and (293.3±63.9) s (t=14.709, P<0.001) and the CD were (391.3±70.0) and (162.3±40.5) mGy (t=13.694,P<0.001) in HBP group and RVA group, respectively. In comparison, the fluoroscopy time and CD for HIS bundle electrode implantation were (501.2±112.3) s and (279.9±65.0) mGy, respectively, significantly higher than in the case of RVA, where the values were (103.4±30.6) s and (57.3±13.8) mGy (t=15.864,Z=-6.524, P<0.001). Conclusions Compared with right ventricular apical pacing, the HIS bundle pacing takes longer operation time, leading to higher radiation dose, which should be prudently selected.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9071568  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=8C10CEA789A144B8018D117382351E4203A59E4D5539D2A85634B2E4E57A9252BB02ACF0746960A12C9B3037ECF9B06B3D02726A2EE8E8267B26F1EC6CA74F20695331E9FA14AE59979AD523C8205D6DC550E37E7170DC5738E24AFAF9671321F8212A6428AA9398&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=0D1D160AB8016934&aid=1484082CBB7CE9E7AD78C66763CAF331&vid=&iid=708DD6B15D2464E8&sid=A766A50385B9FB1F&eid=E348995F86F60FD3&fileno=20201112&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="0D1D160AB8016934"; var my_aid="1484082CBB7CE9E7AD78C66763CAF331";