Xu Guotao,Mu Chuanlong,Ding Wenhong,Sun Jianzhong.Radiation dose and image quality assessment on BodyTom CT[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2018,38(2):150-153
Radiation dose and image quality assessment on BodyTom CT
Received:May 03, 2017  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2018.02.014
KeyWords:Mobile CT  Spatial resolution  Contrast resolution  Radiation dose  Contrast noise ratio
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Xu Guotao Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China  
Mu Chuanlong Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China  
Ding Wenhong Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China  
Sun Jianzhong Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China hzzjsjz@163.com 
Hits: 2977
Download times: 1967
Abstract::
      Objective To evaluate and compare the radiation dose and image quality of the new generation of whole body mobile CT (BodyTom CT) with commonly used fixed CT. Methods The image quality was evaluated with CATPHAN 500 performance test body model. The radiation dose was measured by conventional 100 mm pen ionization chamber and PMMA body phantom and head phantom (head diameter 160 mm,phantom diameter 320 mm and width 140 mm). Results The spatial and contrast resolution of BodyTom CT images were similar to two kinds of fixed CT(P>0.05). The CNR of image with BodyTom CT decreased by about 20%:In head scan mode, significantly lower than that with Philps 64 slice CT and Toshiba 320 slice CT (with soft, t=-4.82,-6.98,P<0.05; with standard, t=-20.60,-20.09,P<0.05); in body scan mode, significantly lower than that with Philps 64 slice CT and Toshiba 320 slice CT (with soft, t=-5.67,-12.82,P<0.05;with standard, t=-3.39,-9.18,P<0.05; with sharp, t=-3.88,-3.21,P<0.05).The radiation dose with BodyTom CT was significantly higher than that with fixed CT:in body model, 22.97% than that with Philps 64(t=9.48,P<0.05), 29.6% than that with Toshiba 320 slice CT(t=11.66,P<0.05); in head model, 29.76% than that with Philps 64 slice CT(t=23.44,P<0.05), 33.22% than that with Toshiba 320 slice CT(t=23.11,P<0.05). Conclusions The radiation dose with mobile CT was over 20%higher than that with routine multi-row CT while with the similar image quality.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9074548  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=15C444C2D45CD59A6F908E44FA6959CE1FF3AC930047E752A65ED9608B09EAB627A8FDEAA7EBA810F9335FBFC84C8D4DC54FA47C05A08B11BE76A3A880EF944D&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=EA357AD73C8E13BC&aid=295B27E71BBC5E123C6F1D90D43685C3&vid=&iid=0B39A22176CE99FB&sid=2DBBF45CC176713E&eid=D59111839E7C8BDF&fileno=20180214&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="EA357AD73C8E13BC"; var my_aid="295B27E71BBC5E123C6F1D90D43685C3";