Li Zeshu,Tuo Fei,Zhang Jing,et al.Evaluation result of radionuclide γ-spectrometry in 2016[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2017,37(12):928-932
Evaluation result of radionuclide γ-spectrometry in 2016
Received:July 20, 2017  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2017.12.010
KeyWords:Radionuclides  γ-spectrometry  Relative deviation  Z-score  U-score
FundProject:科技部基础性工作专项资金(2014FY211000)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Li Zeshu Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China  
Tuo Fei Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China flytuo@163.com 
Zhang Jing Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China  
Zhou Qiang Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China  
Hits: 3541
Download times: 2168
Abstract::
      Objective To evaluate the radionuclide measurability and analyzability of the γ-spectrometry laboratories in radiological technology institutions countrywide, ensure the quality of radionuclide γ-spectrometry and outlook the evaluation work in γ-spectrometry. Methods The 2016 annual evaluation of radionuclide γ-spectrometry was carried, and the accuracy and precision of 232Th, 40K and 137Cs, activity concentration in soil samples were summarized and analyzed in γ-spectrometry laboratories of radiological technology institutions countrywide. Results Of received 45 revaluation receipts, 43 were effective and the other two were ineffective due to the suspension of the evaluation. The relative deviation of the activity concentration values of 232Th, 40K and 137Cs given by most of the institutions were within the range of ±20%, only with two measurements beyond 20%. The evaluation results from the 43 participants were qualified with the overall qualified rate of 100%, of which five were excellent accounting for 11.6% of all. Conclusions All of the elevation results submitted were accurate, showing better measurability. However, some submittals deviated from the references to some degree. Henceforth, it is necessary to strengthen experimental operation and data processing according to the defend procedures and improve the accuracy and precision of measurement results.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:12029823  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=D700F206953109B39D3E8E99A82DCADDA8E6E8366458FF6AE643C1F925CF8FA2B77E191036E6DE7A44A73E7CE2CFB870476FA2718BA08C0B6B6B633E5CCC5EC8&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=FA004A8A4ED1540B&aid=58EC03D86D1FF9204839331DC2568A3E&vid=&iid=59906B3B2830C2C5&sid=635968EA203846B7&eid=796A97DD793AE4A8&fileno=20171210&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="FA004A8A4ED1540B"; var my_aid="58EC03D86D1FF9204839331DC2568A3E";