Cao Ying,Yang Zhen,Qiu Xiaoping,Yang Xiaoyu,Tang Huimin,Lyu Zhiping,Zhang Zijian,Lei Mingjun,Liu Gui,Hu Yongmei.The IMRT accumulative dosimetric verification of NPC using MLC log files[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2015,35(9):665-669
The IMRT accumulative dosimetric verification of NPC using MLC log files
Received:April 13, 2015  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2015.09.006
KeyWords:Nasopharyngeal carcinoma  IMRT dynalog file  Position error  Dosimetry
FundProject:湖南省科技计划项目(2011SK3220)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Cao Ying School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China  
Yang Zhen 中南大学湘雅医院肿瘤科 yangzhen@188.com 
Qiu Xiaoping School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China  
Yang Xiaoyu 中南大学湘雅医院肿瘤科  
Tang Huimin School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, China  
Lyu Zhiping 中南大学湘雅医院肿瘤科  
Zhang Zijian 中南大学湘雅医院肿瘤科  
Lei Mingjun 中南大学湘雅医院肿瘤科  
Liu Gui 中南大学湘雅医院肿瘤科  
Hu Yongmei 中南大学湘雅医院肿瘤科  
Hits: 3021
Download times: 2410
Abstract::
      Objective To verify the accumulative dose of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using linac logfiles, and analyze the relationship between the leaf position errors of multileaf collimator (MLC) and dose distribution changes. Methods In total, 1 400 dynalog files of 28 fractions of 5 NPC patients were tracked and recorded. MLC leaf position information was compared with the planned MLC leaf position information to calculate the MLC leaf position errors of each leaf and the overall mean leaf position error of all patients, which were analyzed and extracted through Argus program. The MLC files were imported into treatment planning system (TPS) to recalculate the dose. Twenty-eight accumulative dose differences between original plans and reconstruction plans, and single relative dose differences were analyzed. Results About 90% of the leaf position errors were less than 0.50 mm, 4%-11% of the leaf position errors were between 0.50-1.00 mm, while there were about 8‰ leaf position errors within 1.00-1.50 mm and the average leaf position error was 0.16 mm. Compared with accumulated dose of original plans and that of reconstruction plans, the average relative dose discrepancies in targets and organs at risk (OARs) induced by leaf position errors were less than±0.1% and±0.6%, and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Compared with single dose of original plans, single dose differences in targets, brainstem, spinal cord and right lens of reconstruction plans were statistically significant (z=-2.02-4.61, 4.46, -4.51, 2.07, P<0.05). Conclusions The accumulative dose verification based on multi-fraction dynamic intensity-modulated MLC log files, to some extent, lessen the dose influence of the single-fraction leaf position errors and the verification results could manifest the practical irradiation dose more accurately.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9058557  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=552A35BFE2E46C11E3A45E45A2FCF317A581BA61CD796E9D1B33F5794C5AEEF1035BC63EC3437F0F7E8A16240C1D1819610B0F7B6240EDF361C59A00D9942F1179B6A25A3A7D5C98023B43AB89D99CF9&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=FFD10F7019FAA9EC&aid=B388734F3248585C5ED34C1B29F3EA58&vid=&iid=9CF7A0430CBB2DFD&sid=D559883475316B44&eid=B10D796AE1B3FEBD&fileno=20150906&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="FFD10F7019FAA9EC"; var my_aid="B388734F3248585C5ED34C1B29F3EA58";