| Jia Fei,Yue Haizhen,Li Guowen,Wu Hao.Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma using flattening filter-free and flattening filter modes[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2014,34(8):597-600 |
| Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma using flattening filter-free and flattening filter modes |
| Received:November 19, 2013 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2014.08.009 |
| KeyWords:Flattening filter-free Volumetric modulated arc therapy Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Dosimetry |
| FundProject: |
|
| Hits: 3480 |
| Download times: 2059 |
| Abstract:: |
| Objective To compare the dosimetric difference of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for the loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients using 6 MV X-ray flattening filter-free (FFF) and flattening filter (FF) modes. Methods Ten previously treated patients with loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively included and re-planned using FFF and FF VMAT, respectively. Meeting all clinical criteria, the dose-volume histograms (DVH), dose distribution of target volume and organs at risk (OARs), target conformity index (CI), total monitor unites (MUs) and treatment time were compared across the plans. Results VMAT plans suing either FFF and FF modes can meet the clinical objectives. The maximum and mean target dose of FFF VMAT plans were significantly higher than that of FF VMAT plans (t=-0.31,-0.35,P<0.05). Yet the planning target volume (PTV) CI of FF mode was slightly better than of FFF mode (t=5.42,P<0.05). The maximum doses of lenses in FFF VMAT plans were lower than that of FF VMAT plans (t=25.87,17.45,P<0.05), and other OARs displayed no significant difference. The mean total MUs of FFF and FF VMAT plans were (699±16) and (628±12) MUs respectively. The mean treatment time of two modes were consistent (about 2 min). Conclusions The plan qualities of FFF and FF VMAT plans were comparable and both clinically acceptable. The OARs at the edge of radiation field, such as lens, could be spared better using FFF VMAT mode. The total MUs of FFF VMAT plans were higher than FF VMAT plans, yet were delivered within the same time. |
| HTML View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
