Liu Zhijie,Zhu Xiaodong,Yang Haiming,Fu Qingguo,Hong Chaoshan,Deng Ye,Yang Zujin,Yang Chaofeng,Rong Xianbing.The dosimetric comparison of different craniospinal irradiation plans and impact of setup error on target dose distribution[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2014,34(7):526-529,558
The dosimetric comparison of different craniospinal irradiation plans and impact of setup error on target dose distribution
Received:October 25, 2013  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2014.07.012
KeyWords:Craniospinal irradiation  Dosimetry  Setup errors  Radiotherapy
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Liu Zhijie Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi 530021, China  
Zhu Xiaodong Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi 530021, China zhuxiaodong83@163.com 
Yang Haiming Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi 530021, China  
Fu Qingguo Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi 530021, China  
Hong Chaoshan Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi 530021, China  
Deng Ye Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi 530021, China  
Yang Zujin Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi 530021, China  
Yang Chaofeng Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi 530021, China  
Rong Xianbing Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi 530021, China  
Hits: 4599
Download times: 2529
Abstract::
      Objective To make a dosimetric comparison of different craniospinal irradiation (CSI) plans and to explore the impacts of setup error on target dose distribution.Methods Five radiotherapy plans[2D-conventional,single filed 3D(3D-1),three fields 3D(3D-3),IMRT and electron] were made from 9 patients' CT images, who received CSI from July 2011 to October 2012. The target coverage (V95), hot spot(V107), maximum dose (Dmax), conformal index (CI) and dose homogeneity index (HI) of the target of each plan were compared. The volume of thyroid, heart, lungs, small intestine, kidney and normal tissue irradiated by 5,15,25 Gy were observed. The setup errors of the three treatment centers(head, upper spinal, lower spinal) per week were recorded and the treatment centers of the five plan in the week were moved according to the collected data to make a new plan, then the comparison of the target doses with the original plans were performed. Results The V95 of electron was lower than the other groups (q=11.2-11.7,P<0.05), the difference between the rest of the group was not statistically significant (q=0.00-0.01,P> 0.05). IMRT had the smallest V107 (q=4.3-11.6,P<0.05), followed by the 3D-3 (q=4.3-7.1,P<0.05), 2D had the largest Dmax (q=2.4-2.7,P<0.05). The differences from HI in each group was not statistically significant.CIs from high to low were IMRT> 3D-3> 2D, 3D-1 and electron (q=7.1-14.3, 7.1-9.6, 0.00-0.01, P<0.05). IMRT and electron could significantly reduce the volume irradiated by 15 Gy and 25 Gy and 3D-3 was the second. However, compared with 2D and 3D-1, there were 5 Gy irradiation volume increased in 3D-3 and IMRT. When setup errors were taken into account, there was the smallest difference between the dose distribution of 3D-1, 3D-3 and the original plan(q=2.8-4.1,P<0.05). Conclusions For those spinal cord depth<4.5 cm, electron could be regarded as a kind of safe and reliable way of CSI. Although the CI of 3D-1 is slightly less, it still could be used as the choice of CSI with the trend of less being affected by setup errors and reducing low dose volume. While the 3D-3 and IMRT have better target dose distribution, the large volume of low dose region is a thought-provoking problem.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9072045  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=E29B04634B0E836E386CF964BF8E02AB0EC6FDF33C54BB82297C1B286B742F231EA2FB21F4EEBCB7BDF5C0F62F859F72F903906A26E6487E626BFA87F7986713FB2860DCEFE7A28BCFBCF24070F13F36F3692F0EA0C830200B82E422E4AAB640E5C2A42CCEBE10A1F7C718937B24A3E0594DAC345E53AAED2BB3ACBDE2EB2724&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=9EAD63ADE6B277ED&aid=0430BD2A3227970B39BB6DEC9FA570B3&vid=&iid=DF92D298D3FF1E6E&sid=E3D3D8D1B650AE1E&eid=75F60C8D277AA24A&fileno=20140712&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="9EAD63ADE6B277ED"; var my_aid="0430BD2A3227970B39BB6DEC9FA570B3";