WANG Qing-xin,DAI Jian-rong,ZHANG Ke,YANG Xin.The sensitivity of patient-specific VMAT QA to MLC positioning errors[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2013,33(4):388-391
The sensitivity of patient-specific VMAT QA to MLC positioning errors
Received:January 25, 2013  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2013.04.013
KeyWords:Volumetric-modulated arc therapy(VMAT)  Patient-specific QA  Multileaf collimator (MLC)  Positioning errors  Passing rate
FundProject:国家自然科学基金(10975187)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
WANG Qing-xin School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China  
DAI Jian-rong 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放疗科 dai_jianrong@163.com 
ZHANG Ke 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放疗科  
YANG Xin 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放疗科  
Hits: 3993
Download times: 2321
Abstract::
      Objective To evaluate the sensitivity of patient-specific volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) quality assurance(QA)to minor multileaf collimator (MLC) positioning errors. Methods Systematic multileaf collimator (MLC) positioning errors (±0.5 mm, ±1 mm and ±2 mm) were introduced into the clinical VMAT patient plans with 2 types of MLC positioning errors: systematic MLC gap width errors and systematic MLC shift errors for 6 cases, including 3 cases with prostatic cancer and 3 cases with nasopharyngeal cancer. The planar dose distributions of the original and modified plans were measured using ArcCheck array. The coincidence between the measured results and the calculated results was evaluated using both absolute distance-to-agreement (AD-DTA) analysis with 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria. Results The average passing rate of the 6 original VMAT plans was 96.0% with the AD-DTA criteria of 3%/3 mm which was commonly adopted in clinical practice. For the MLC gap width errors of +1 mm, +2 mm, and-2 mm and the MLC shift errors of 2 mm, the drop levels in average passing rate with the AD-DTA criteria of 3%/3 mm were 8.8%, 15.5%, 6.1% and 7.9%, respectively. The ±2 mm MLC positioning errors and +1 mm MLC gap width errors could be detected by the patient-specific VMAT QA procedure. The AD-DTA criteria of 2%/2 mm was more sensitive compared with the criteria of 3%/3 mm. Conclusions Patient-specific VMAT QA is not sensitive enough to detect the systematic MLC positioning errors within 1 mm. Additional MLC QA is needed to guarantee the accuracy of VMAT delivery.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9079245  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=4CF9CC420368003DB5B276BDEFF89DFFBD802AE5174598138B0EB29DB68ACFA60F72064DFACDEE126A2F0BB19F1D982DA29EB5FC8E04DE7D43C86634B88CA4DD854822A612F287A6&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=FF7AA908D58E97FA&aid=CBE5FA4F89B07936BCCC55EA24DC94F2&vid=&iid=E158A972A605785F&sid=3BAAE0DA6093AC05&eid=AFB2C35009D5D191&fileno=20130413&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="FF7AA908D58E97FA"; var my_aid="CBE5FA4F89B07936BCCC55EA24DC94F2";