YU Ren-qiang,ZENG Yong-ming,LUO Su-xin,TAO Li,PENG Sheng-kun,WANG Jie,TAN Huan,LIU Xiao.Comparison of radiation dose between XperSwing technique and conventional coronary angiography: phantom study[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2013,33(2):198-200
Comparison of radiation dose between XperSwing technique and conventional coronary angiography: phantom study
Received:October 30, 2012  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2013.02.023
KeyWords:Interventional radiology  Coronary angiography  Radiation dose  Phantom
FundProject:重庆市卫生局科研基金资助项目(2010-2-055)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
YU Ren-qiang Department of Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China  
ZENG Yong-ming 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科 zeng-ym@vip.sina.com 
LUO Su-xin 重庆医科大学附属第一医院心内科  
TAO Li 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科  
PENG Sheng-kun 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科  
WANG Jie 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科  
TAN Huan 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科  
LIU Xiao 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科  
Hits: 3440
Download times: 2180
Abstract::
      Objective To evaluate the effective organ radiation dose in patients with conventional coronary angiography(CCA) and XperSwing coronary angiography. Methods The operating environment of CCA and XperSwing coronary angiography was simulated using the Chinese anthropomorphic chest phantom. The thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were placed on major organs of the phantomm. The organs' absorbed doses were measured and the dose-area products (DAPs) were recorded. The real effective dose was the summation of products of every organs' absorbed dose × a factor. The calculated effective doses was the product of the DAP × a factor. Results The average absorbed effective doses of XperSwing coronary angiography were lower than that of the CCA. The calculated effective doses of CCA and XperSwing coronary angiography were 3.88 mSv and 3.13 mSv, respectively, and less than the real ones (5.57 mSv, 4.94 mSv). Conclusions XperSwing coronary angiography would have less radiation dose than CCA does. The calculated effective dose would be less than the real one.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9058880  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=8C10CEA789A144B852624DC3428AEC5852E2A7923B946F237625176761AE872E5E2A4CC8CEA33C642E52E04FB44028BBECD170CE6765100807F0646A43F928B6BFA3725BE6B9F4B235CE6207A256D43821535067068BC8676A21E0A4CA5ED2EE25E5906BE50FADE7EB8BF4B537927735&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=FF7AA908D58E97FA&aid=7B2D9635C2812955C990EA3F43BBB8BB&vid=&iid=0B39A22176CE99FB&sid=FEF02B4635FE8227&eid=1E41DF9426604740&fileno=20130223&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="FF7AA908D58E97FA"; var my_aid="7B2D9635C2812955C990EA3F43BBB8BB";