MA Yang-guang,ZHANG Ke,HU Zhi-hui,et al.Verification of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plan by log-file analysis of linear accelerator[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2012,32(3):285-288
Verification of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plan by log-file analysis of linear accelerator
Received:October 11, 2011  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2012.03.016
KeyWords:Volumetric modulated arc therapy  Log-file  Verification of treatment plan
FundProject:国家自然科学基金(10975187)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
MA Yang-guang School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China  
ZHANG Ke 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放疗科  
HU Zhi-hui 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放疗科  
SONG Yi-xin 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放疗科  
DAI Jian-rong 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放疗科 dai_jianrong@163.com 
Hits: 8525
Download times: 3164
Abstract::
      Objective To verify the dose delivery accuracy of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plan by log-file analysis of linear accelerator that can be created when a dynamic delivery occurs.Methods Accelerator log file in binary format recorded the accelerator execution plan for each control point corresponding to the gantry angle, multi-leaf collimator leave position, cumulative machine monitor units (MU). These information were read from the accelerator log file with Matlab7.1, then the original control points in the plan file replaced the corresponding information for the log, which generated a new plan. New plan was exported into the planning system to recalculate the dose. The volume dose histogram (DVH) and dose distribution was contrasted to determine the accuracy of the accelerator plan of implementation between two plans.Results Compared with the original plan, antry angle difference over ±1° accounted for about 35% of the entire arc of control points in 4 of 12 arcs and the percentage of the leave error of ±0.5 mm was about 95%. MU error of a single control point was larger, but the cumulative MU for each arc was small which was located between -0.09% to 0.11% in the selected 12 arcs. Between the targets, the maximum dose, minimum dose, the mean dose differences were from -0.07% to 0.42%, -0.38% to 0.40%, 0.03% to 0.08%, respectively. The maximum dose and mean dose differences of organs at risks were located from -1.16% to 2.51%, -1.21% to 3.12%, respectively.Conclusions Accelerator log-file analysis to verify the VMAT plan can be supplyed to the experimental method supplement.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:11566297  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=BF7E82E5F022C752D74314D26FEFC0EA90208877678B86014C2AAC487363D236B6ECA4AF9BD36C35B5E5E9A5A800EB06B05A582B40E4FD2D8BBAD10574A3A5C5A5A73BDB7E6BDFD8B1314FE800409F7479A378E8295DB5654026919B76CC5942CA8F438D53D171C2&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=99E9153A83D4CB11&aid=669A8D56CCC2B6A10DBEAE05CDA76E9A&vid=&iid=38B194292C032A66&sid=B8F8200D88DDC7D6&eid=334C61CAF4C8EF4E&fileno=20120316&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="99E9153A83D4CB11"; var my_aid="669A8D56CCC2B6A10DBEAE05CDA76E9A";