| ZHOU Xiao-lin,FAN Qiu-hong,QIAN Jian-jun,et al.Comparison of dosimetry between inversely optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using the field-in-field after breast-conserving surgery[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2011,31(6):675-679 |
| Comparison of dosimetry between inversely optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using the field-in-field after breast-conserving surgery |
| Received:March 13, 2011 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2011.06.014 |
| KeyWords:Breast cancer Breast-conserving surgery Dosimetry Inversely optimised IMRT 3D-CRT using field-in-field |
| FundProject:江苏省"十二五"临床医学重点学科资助 |
| Author Name | Affiliation | | ZHOU Xiao-lin | Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215004 Suzhou, China | | FAN Qiu-hong | Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215004 Suzhou, China | | QIAN Jian-jun | Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215004 Suzhou, China | | ZHOU Gang | Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215004 Suzhou, China | | TIAN Ye | Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215004 Suzhou, China |
|
| Hits: 4704 |
| Download times: 2444 |
| Abstract:: |
| Objective To compare the dosimetry between inversely optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using the field-in-field technique (FIF) for whole-breast radiotherapy with a boost to the tumor bed after breast-conserving surgery. Methods IMRT and FIF treatment plans were respectively performed and optimised for 9 patients with early stage left-breast cancer after breast-concerving surgery. The prescribed dose of breast was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, 1.8 Gy per fraction and that of tumor bed was 61.6 Gy in 28 fractions, 2.2 Gy per fraction. The conformity index, the dose and volume for OAR(organs at risks), time of planning and treatment for the two plans were compared. Results The conformity index(CI)for IMRT was improved compared with the FIF in breast [(1.82±0.16) vs.(2.21±0.15)] and tumor bed [(1.19±0.04) vs.(1.59±0.11), t=2.08, 3.97, P<0.05]. There was no difference for V20 of ipsilateral lung and V30 of heart between two plans. The Dmax and Dmean of the contralateral lung of FIF were (5.41±2.76) and (0.51±0.10) Gy, lower than those of IMRT [(25.72±2.61) and (7.46±0.39) Gy, t=-22.44,-21.14, P<0.05]. The Dmax and Dmean of the contralateral breast of FIF were (8.50±5.61) and (0.47±0.11) Gy, lower than those of IMRT [(27.73±4.30) and (6.38±0.48) Gy, t=-5.66,-14.83, P<0.05]. For FIF, the V5 of the contralateral lung and breast were (0.09±0.09) % and (0.45±0.45) % , respectively, lower than those of IMRT, which were (84.66±3.06) % and (60.79±4.94)%(t=-28.19,-12.80, P<0.05). The time of optimised plan was (61.57±0.89)min for FIF and(241.28±1.06)min for IMRT (t=-32.35, P<0.05), and that of treatment were (16.14±1.42) min for FIF and (29.85±0.59)min for IMRT (t=-8.82, P<0.05). Conclusions For patients with early stage breast cancer after breast-concerving surgery,IMRT could improve the conformity index of target but increase the dose of contralateral lung and breast. However, FIF has advantage on the time of optimising plan and treatment. |
| HTML View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
