QIAN Yu-e,HU Hong-jie,WANG Dan,WANG Gao-feng,JIANG Feng,ZHANG Shi-zheng.Assessment of coronary artery stent and radiation dose using dual source CT[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2011,31(3):366-369
Assessment of coronary artery stent and radiation dose using dual source CT
Received:January 16, 2011  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2011.03.033
KeyWords:Dual source CT  Coronary artery stent  Radiation dose
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliation
QIAN Yu-e Department of Radiology , Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China 
HU Hong-jie Department of Radiology , Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China 
WANG Dan Department of Radiology , Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China 
WANG Gao-feng Department of Radiology , Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China 
JIANG Feng Department of Radiology , Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China 
ZHANG Shi-zheng Department of Radiology , Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China 
Hits: 2819
Download times: 2057
Abstract::
      Objective To compare a prospective ECG-gated high-pitch spiral technique (Flash) and conventional retrospective ECG-gated spiral technique for the image quality of coronary artery stent and radiation dose with a dual source CT. Methods One hundred and fifty five coronary stents in one hundred and twenty patients (mean age 64.9±10.6 years, heart rates≤65 bpm) were examined using a dual source CT. All patients were divided in two groups, receiving either Flash or conventional coronary artery CT angiography separately. After images of coronary artery were reconstructed using both the smooth (B26) and sharp (B46) kernel, the coronary stent image quality and stent lumen were scored by two observers individually using four point scale (1=excellent, 4=unvaluable). The effective radiation dose of volume CT dose index (CTDIvol, mGy) and dose length product (DLP, mGy×cm) were also calculated for each patient. χ2 -test analysis of image quality andt-test analysis of radiation dose were used respectively for statistical difference between two groups. Results Interobserver agreement for stent image quality was good ( Kappa =0.764, P <0.001). The mean scores were 1.61±0.77 and 1.65±0.82 in Flash group and conventional group respectively. There was no significant difference in image quality between the two groups ( χ2 =0.865, P =0.834). The effective radiation dose in Flash group was significantly lower than that in conventional group. The mean values of CTDIvol were 3.24±1.21 in Flash group and 31.26±10.79 in conventional group (t=19.83, P <0.001), and the mean values of DLP in Flash group and conventional group were 54.61±19.88 and 468.30±174.88, respectively (t=18.06, P <0.001). Conclusions Compared with the conventiaonal coronary artery CT angiography, the Flash coronary artery CT angiography technique has a similar coronary stent image quality, but at a lower radiation dose in patients with heart rates lower than 65 beats per minute.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9073135  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=EB1E2AC52F440479E024D3E6108549A89FABDE07FC2BA6C4CBA3E8185C21EC8649AAF72BE6D02B78013C1FC29659D1BEE4CAD8C92E780930E730A989DA026A1E5E3D81EF57A496344E103222086E6779&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=9377ED8094509821&aid=74E6B012CEA07419517452CA6CBEB09A&vid=&iid=38B194292C032A66&sid=2E41258BCB9A7DB2&eid=F7BB24011DC0D223&fileno=20110333&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="9377ED8094509821"; var my_aid="74E6B012CEA07419517452CA6CBEB09A";