QIU Guo-qin,ZHU Cheng-long,DU Xiang-hui,et al.A dosimetric comparison of three plans in simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy in cervical esophageal carcinoma undergoing prophylactic lymphatic irradiation[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2011,31(1):46-49
A dosimetric comparison of three plans in simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy in cervical esophageal carcinoma undergoing prophylactic lymphatic irradiation
Received:April 20, 2010  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2011.01.012
KeyWords:Esophageal neoplasms  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy  Simultaneous integrated boost  Lymphatic irradiation,prophylactic  Dosimetry
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliation
QIU Guo-qin Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China 
ZHU Cheng-long Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China 
DU Xiang-hui Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China 
CHEN Jian-xiang Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China 
Hits: 4578
Download times: 2843
Abstract::
      Objective To evaluate the optimized simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) plans in cervical esophageal carcinoma underwent prophylactic lymphatic irradiation. Methods Six patients with cervical esophageal carcinoma were studied. The gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) (including bilateral mid-lower neck and supraclavicular lymph drainage regions, upper mediastinal lymph drainage regions) were delineated on sim-CT images, GTV and CTV were uniformly expanded by 5 mm to create PGTV and PTV. Five fields(5F),7F and 9F SIB-IMRT plans were designed. The prescribed doses to PGTV and PTV were 66 Gy and 60 Gy in 30 fractions respectively. The parameters of dose-volume histograms in three groups planning were compared. Results The values of conformity index(CI) of PGTV were 0.56, 0.62 and 0.69 (F=6.22,P<0.01), the V66 with 88.24%,95.03% and 94.91%(F=4.39,P<0.05)and D95 with 6539.67,6601.83 and 6602.00 cGy (F=4.46,P<0.05) in 5F,7F and 9F SIB-IMRT plans. The values of CI, V66 and D95 of PTV were 0.80,0.85 and 0.87 (F=11.29,P<0.01), with 91.64%, 94.05% and 95.06% (F=4.10,P<0.05) and with 5934.00,5987.17 and 6006.33 cGy (F=4.01,P<0.05). The values of maximal dose of spinal cord were 4707.17,4497.83 and 4357.00 cGy(F=11.26,P<0.01)in 5F,7F and 9F SIB-IMRT plans. The values of all dosimetic parameters about PGTV and PTV were same in 7F and 9F SIB-IMRT plans(all P>0.05). Conclusion 7F-SIB-IMRT plan is best one scheme for cervical esophageal carcinoma underwent prophylactic lymphatic irradiation.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:11565326  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=0C253F34206287688BE566376FCE76066CEC14DE0365554CE4EEE7E6307A7BEC5D991F33ED03EAC89F1C1DD9C45E637A39FAB80FD9E07303A8F99C49D93A66A53BEB4BE53F3E4A9FD92F8F98CA467FE2918388DBD4AC2D3315B25800CB3D54C04272BBC3FC2A3D80975D7684A9CE1B5472DC52483F1A3A4C219D6DDFB02FF82C4C389CE0C10C3AAC802BDB01C2D46FCE05A0D9577AF4CC19B6AA9E56090449F64C09750D150F80A1027147A1121BDD321BA234C38B647731&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=9377ED8094509821&aid=44F006F75B3385462C9C798F21E04237&vid=&iid=CA4FD0336C81A37A&sid=D997634CFE9B6321&eid=2A3781E88AB1776F&fileno=20110112&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="9377ED8094509821"; var my_aid="44F006F75B3385462C9C798F21E04237";