MA Chang-sheng,YIN Yong,LIU Tong-hai,CHEN Jin-hu,SUN Tao,LIN Xiu-tong.Dosimetric comparision between RapidArc and fixed gantry intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of liver carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2010,30(5):581-584,590
Dosimetric comparision between RapidArc and fixed gantry intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of liver carcinoma
Received:January 06, 2010  
DOI:
KeyWords:RapidArc  IMRT  Liver carcinoma  Dosimetry
FundProject:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
MA Chang-sheng Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radio-oncology, Jinan 250117,China  
YIN Yong Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radio-oncology, Jinan 250117,China yinyongsd@yahoo.com.cn 
LIU Tong-hai Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radio-oncology, Jinan 250117,China  
CHEN Jin-hu Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radio-oncology, Jinan 250117,China  
SUN Tao Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radio-oncology, Jinan 250117,China  
LIN Xiu-tong Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radio-oncology, Jinan 250117,China  
Hits: 3219
Download times: 2415
Abstract::
      Objective To compare the dosimetric difference of RapidArc and fixed gantry IMRT for liver carcinoma. Methods The CT data of 10 liver cancer patients were used to design 3 groups of treatment plan:IMRT plan, single arc RapidArc plan(RA1) , and dual arc RapidArc plan(RA2). The planning target volume(PTV) dosimetric distrubition,the organs at risk(OAR) dose, the normal tissue dose, mornitor units(MU) and treatment time were compared. Results The maximum dose of PTV in RA1 and RA2 plans were lower than that of IMRT(Z=-2.090,-2.666,P<0.05).RapidArc groups had an improved 90% prescription dose conformity index than IMRT(Z=-2.805,-2.809,P<0.05). For organs at risk, RapidArc group plan had a significantly lower dose in V40 of stomach and small bowel than IMRT plan,but higher in mean dose of left kidney(Z=-1.988,-2.191,P<0.05). The values of V</em>5, V10 and V15of healthy tissue in RapidArc plan groups were higher than those in IMRT plan, while the values of V20,V25 and V30of healthy tissue in RapidArc plan groups were lower than those in IMRT plan. The number of computed MU/fraction of Rapid Arc plan was 40% or 46% of IMRT plan and the treatment time was 30% and 40% of IMRT. Conclusion\ RapidArc showed improvements in conformity index and healthy tissue sparing with uncompromised target coverage. RapidArc could lead to the less MU and shorter delivery time compared to IMRT.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9080061  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=8400690B225D0A440FF4B0AFFBF4835C9E98EAEFED74318AD4A239A20A50BECA83E547E506228DBCE72C154C6CBF4C5D1AA31D0A1D99F10D5D3F2989B52BBCF93FECC885F248275527929E0A1C2A6722733D6788A87D0DB73D490360D54112AADD1621C5FA4A26B3688C25F65AEE1E5DAD8751C82D7BD2DAFB455E1263A25983&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=140ECF96957D60B2&aid=8C23EDBF275DDD435E01A8964655AE56&vid=&iid=94C357A881DFC066&sid=93ADA2AA3F969E58&eid=4E4730562585A76B&fileno=20100524&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="140ECF96957D60B2"; var my_aid="8C23EDBF275DDD435E01A8964655AE56";