CAO Guo-quan,XU Hua-zhi,TAI Yun-peng,WU En-fu,ZHENG Xiang-wu.Investigation of optimum exposure dose for chest imaging using CR and amorphous silocon DR system[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2010,30(3):350-353
Investigation of optimum exposure dose for chest imaging using CR and amorphous silocon DR system
Received:November 20, 2009  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2010.03.033
KeyWords:Digital radiography  Image quality  Exposure dose  Quality control
FundProject:温州市科技局科技计划项目(Y20090215)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
CAO Guo-quan Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China  
XU Hua-zhi Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China  
TAI Yun-peng Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China  
WU En-fu Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China wzwef@163.com 
ZHENG Xiang-wu Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China  
Hits: 3783
Download times: 2137
Abstract::
      Objective To compare the difference of entrance dose between CR and amorphous silocon DR system in chest imaging, and to discuss their optimum exposure dose.Methods For CR and DR,different entrance dose was measured by dosimeter in chest phantom. The value of IQFinv was analyzed by CDRAD2.0 software. Image quality difference between CR and DR was assessed by grouPt-test. The relationship between image quality and entrance dose was tested by using Pearson correlation analysis. The best IQFinv values in CR and DR system were achieved via ROC curve analysis, and the exposure dose was then calculated.Results There were direct correlation values between entrance dose and the value of IQFinv in CR and DR system, respectively(r =0.893,0.848, P<0.01). The linear regression equation for DR was IQFinv =0.005D+3.359, and for CR was IQFinv =0.005D+1.651, where D was entrance dose. The difference of IQFinv value between CR and DR was significant (t =5.455, P<0.05). The best IQFinv value of the two groups from ROC analysis was 3.55.Conclusions With the entrance dose increased, the detection ability of contrast-detail was elevated in the two digital radiography systems. With equal entrance dose, the detection ability of DR in contrast-detail was superior to CR. With equal image quality, DR obviously decreased the radiation dose to the patients.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:9064492  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=9A2B3ECE8B55D590E6E355423D82FAFDECCF52E69BD54D98A358A923AC3146B5CE336F8FFAF1CAFA317A165E7E8A4759DB66107B90966764A8EF75CB267DE7E89272F0D683845722EC2E44480BCFCA49AF11F52FA5D6580DB0089D346E58B24BF5EF0F3166030AEA&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=140ECF96957D60B2&aid=77E7CA7D36B4FB4D6DF8E5B6FCA2E1C5&vid=&iid=38B194292C032A66&sid=406BF8ED3BCE1927&eid=A5111BA190517959&fileno=20100333&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="140ECF96957D60B2"; var my_aid="77E7CA7D36B4FB4D6DF8E5B6FCA2E1C5";