ZHANG Peng,ZHANG Jie,WAN Ling,et al.Safety evaluation in vicinity during and after 125I seeds implantation in head and neck region[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2010,30(2):209-212
Safety evaluation in vicinity during and after 125I seeds implantation in head and neck region
Received:October 08, 2009  
DOI:
KeyWords:125I-seeds  Radiation dose  Radiation protection  Head and neck tumor
FundProject:首都医学发展科研基金(2005-2006)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
ZHANG Peng Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China  
ZHANG Jie Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China  
WAN Ling 北京市疾病预防控制中心  
ZHANG Hong-zhi 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放射治疗科  
Zhang Jian-guo Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China serphroth@126.com 
Hits: 3888
Download times: 2509
Abstract::
      Objective To measure the radiation dose during and after 125I seeds implantation in head and neck region,and to evaluate the radiation safety in the vicinity.Methods Forty patients who had 125I seeds implanted in head and neck region were divided into two groups as facial and neck group as well as intra-oral group. The radiation doses were measured at the distance of 30 cm in three different directions during operation and at the distances of 30, 50, and 100 cm after operation when the patients opened and closed their mouth, respectively. Results The radiation dose rate on the treatment side [(2.60±0.37) μSv] was higher than that on the other two sides [(0.28±0.05) and (0.15±0.03) μSv] during the operation, with the statistical difference (t=25.62, 29.51, P< 0.05). In the intra-oral group, the radiation dose rates at the distances of 30 and 50 cm were higher when the patients opened their mouths [(21.71±0.92) and (9.50±0.38) μSv/h] than those when they closed their mouths [(9.29±1.14) and (4.61±1.61) μSv/h], with the statistical difference (t=35.87, 13.70, P<0.05), but without statistical difference at the distance of 100 cm distance [(1.54±0.05) and (1.34±0.45) μSv](t=1.94, P >0.05).On the treated side at all the distances of 30,50, and 100 cm, the radiation dose rates were higher in the facial and neck group [(66.28±3.31), (35.06±3.05) and (1.72±0.17) μSv/h] than those in the intra-oral group [(52.46±3.54), (20.78±2.01) and (1.55±0.13) μSv/h], with the statistical difference (t=12.74, 15.51,3.69, P< 0.05). At the distance of 100 cm, the radiation dose rates were (1.72±0.17) μSv/h in facial and neck group, (1.55±0.13) μSv/h when they opened their mouth and (1.18±0.42) μSv/h when they closed their mouth in the intra-oral group, which was safe for the public.Conclusions Radiation exposure to the medical workers and the public from the patients is very low. It is easy to achieve the radiation safety by reducing the exposure time, increasing the distance and changing the exposure direction.
HTML  View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close

Copyright©    Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection    

Beijing ICP No. 05020547 -2

Address: 2 Xinkang Street, Dewai, Beijing 100088, China

Telephone:010-62389620; Email:cjrmp@cjrmp.sina.net

Technical Support:Beijing E-tiller CO.,LTD.

Visitors:11565461  On-line:0

v
Scan QR Code
&et=7EB54E4C4520598FCE6EBFCD5ED2093137B1D7C9F2F618FAF67FDBDD9CF4A65438E5058B7BDF9A5D9BB7B7AC1FC05D0EB4B3F6A97F9BE9C71A3315EA298E4C718CC179B64F3AA20AD1579C7903E73FD977F18DEF1AE42A4E895ED2ED97EBFF5EBD68169E1711B2AFCBC8E29F83E4238D&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=D4D466D60FDC1A5A&jid=5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C&yid=140ECF96957D60B2&aid=0CBEE7179E070374A0926DB2DC79BC0E&vid=&iid=0B39A22176CE99FB&sid=79D2EF35F60110C2&eid=D2742EEE6F4DF8FE&fileno=20100227&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="D4D466D60FDC1A5A"; var my_jid="5E4353813E091AB841B02B880782B82C"; var my_yid="140ECF96957D60B2"; var my_aid="0CBEE7179E070374A0926DB2DC79BC0E";