| 唐霈泽,王晓睿,姚竹,等.2022—2024年全国各级疾病预防控制机构放射卫生检测能力比对结果分析[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2025,45(8):724-730.Tang Peize,Wang Xiaorui,Yao Zhu,et al.Analysis of results of radiation detection capability intercomparison between disease control and prevention institutions at provincial, municpal and county levels in China from 2022 to 2024[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2025,45(8):724-730 |
| 2022—2024年全国各级疾病预防控制机构放射卫生检测能力比对结果分析 |
| Analysis of results of radiation detection capability intercomparison between disease control and prevention institutions at provincial, municpal and county levels in China from 2022 to 2024 |
| 投稿时间：2025-05-12 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20250512-00164 |
| 中文关键词: 放射卫生 疾病预防控制机构 能力比对 |
| 英文关键词:Radiation hygiene Disease control and provention institutions Intercomparison |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 310 |
| 全文下载次数: 191 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 分析2022—2024年放射卫生检测能力比对中各级疾病预防控制机构的个人剂量监测和总α总β放射性测量比对结果,为我国疾病预防控制机构放射卫生检测能力建设和政策制定提供参考依据。方法 收集2022—2024年全国放射卫生技术机构检测能力比对中个人剂量监测和总α总β放射性测量两项结果进行数据录入,采用SPSS 22.0软件对不同年份、级别、地区的疾病预防控制机构能力比对合格率(含优秀)和优秀率进行分析。结果 2022—2024年全国各级疾病预防控制机构的参加数量总体呈上升趋势,省、市、县级疾控机构参加数量从2022年的262家增长为2024年的430家,市级疾控数量增长尤为明显。在2024年的总α总β放射性测量能力比对中,市级不合格率高于县级,差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.53,P <0.01)。2022年和2024年的市级总α总β放射性测量合格率(含优秀)低于2023年,差异有统计学意义(χ2=29.93,P <0.01)。各区域中,2024年个人剂量监测比对结果,华东地区的合格率(含优秀)高于西南和西北,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=15.62、16.21,P <0.01)。2022年总α总β放射性测量比对结果,华东、华南地区的合格率(含优秀)高于西北,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=23.76、11.22,P <0.01)。总体上,华东地区的两项比对合格率(含优秀)较为优秀,西北地区合格率(含优秀)较低。结论 近年来全国各级疾病预防控制机构的放射卫生技术机构检测能力比对成绩有所提升,但依旧存在部分市县级疾控实验室检测能力不足、不同地区能力发展不平衡等问题。建议国家政策多向市、县级疾控以及西北地区等欠发达地区倾斜,提高实验室技术人员的专业技能和质量管理水平。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To analyze the intercomparision result of personal dose monitoring and gross alpha/beta detection capability between the disease control and prevention institutions at provincial, municpal and county levels during 2022-2024, in order to provide a reference for radiation detection capability and policy making of these institutions in China. Methods Data on personal dose monitoring and gross alpha/beta detection, obtanied from the 2022-2024 radiation detection capability intercomparison between the disease control and prevention institutions at different levels, were recorded. Both the qualification rates (including excellence) and excellence rates of all the institutions at all evels from 2022 to 2024 were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Results From 2022 to 2024, the number of participating institutions at all levels showed an overall upward trend, increasing from 262 to 430, with particularly notable growth at the municipal level. In the 2024 gross α/β detection capability intercomparison, the non-qualification rate in municipal-level institutions was significantly higher than in county-level institutions (χ2=10.53, P < 0.05). The qualification rate (including excellence) of the municipal-level gross alpha/beta detection in 2022 and 2024 were lower than in 2023(χ2=29.93, P < 0.01). Among all regions, the 2024 personal dose monitoring intercomparison result showed that the qualification rate (including excellence) in East China was higher than in Southwest and Northwest China (χ2=15.62, P <0.01). East China also outperformed Northwest China (χ2=16.21, P <0.01). In the 2022 gross alpha/beta detection capability intercomparison, the qualification rate (including excellent performance) in East China and South China was higher than in Northwest China (χ2=23.76, 11.22,P<0.01). Overall, East China showed relatively higher qualification rate in intercomparison result of both personal dose monitoring and radiation detection (including excellence), while Northwest China showed lower qualification rates (including excellence). Conclusions Although the radiation detection capability of disease control and prevention institutions at all levels has improved in recent years, there are still insufficience of detection capabilities at some municipal- and county-level laboratories and even unbalance between different regionas. Policy support should prioritize underdeveloped areas, such as municipal- and county-level institutions and the Northwest, and enhance the technical proficiency and quality management of laboratory personnel. |
| HTML 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|