| 李明芳,刘小莲,麦维基,等.2019—2023年广东省34家医疗机构介入放射学工作人员眼晶状体剂量调查分析[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2025,45(2):108-115.Li Mingfang,Liu Xiaolian,Mai Weiji,et al.Investigation and analysis of eye lens dose of interventional radiology staff in 34 medical institutions in Guangdong province during 2019-2023[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2025,45(2):108-115 |
| 2019—2023年广东省34家医疗机构介入放射学工作人员眼晶状体剂量调查分析 |
| Investigation and analysis of eye lens dose of interventional radiology staff in 34 medical institutions in Guangdong province during 2019-2023 |
| 投稿时间：2024-05-14 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20240514-00176 |
| 中文关键词: 眼晶状体 个人剂量 外照射 医疗机构 |
| 英文关键词:Eye lens Personal dose External irradiation Medical institution |
| 基金项目:广东省医学科研基金项目(B2020119,B2023283,C2020029,C2022034) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1256 |
| 全文下载次数: 576 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 分析2019—2023年广东省医疗机构介入放射学工作人员眼晶状体剂量监测情况。方法 本研究采用方便抽样方法, 用热释光剂量测量法对2019—2023年广东省34家三级医疗机构介入放射学工作人员的眼晶状体剂量及胸部剂量进行监测, 对监测数据进行汇总分析, 并对两者之间关系进行探索。结果 共监测介入放射学工作人员1 033人次, 监测眼晶状体剂量范围在[<最低探测水平(MDL)~26.12 mSv]之间, M(P25, P75)为0.03(< MDL, 0.20) mSv, 剂量＜MDL、MDL~、1.25 mSv~、5 mSv~、10 mSv~、20 mSv~分别为428、543、48、5、6、3人次, 分别占总监测人次的41.43%、52.57%、4.65%、0.48%、0.58%、0.29%;各年眼晶状体剂量范围分别为(< MDL~0.42) mSv、(< MDL~4.95) mSv、(< MDL~26.12) mSv、(< MDL~10.66) mSv、(< MDL~5.41) mSv;各年剂量M(P25, P75)分别为M(P25, P75)分别为0.05(< MDL, 0.16) mSv、0.07(< MDL, 0.28) mSv、0.04(< MDL, 0.09) mSv、0.03(< MDL, 0.03) mSv、H = 49.85, P < 0.01), 剂量较高的是综合介入、心血管介入放射工作人员, 较低者为肿瘤介入放射工作人员;经Spearman相关性检验, 介入放射学工作人员眼晶状体及胸部剂量相关呈显著性(R = 0.37, P <0.001);经线性回归函数拟合得出关系式:眼晶状体剂量 = 1.044×胸部剂量。结论 广东省医疗机构介入放射学工作人员眼晶状体剂量监测结果大致良好, 不同工种、不同介入类别工作人员接受剂量不同, 心血管介入和综合介入工作人员是改善放射防护工作的重点。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To study and analyze radiation doses to the eye of the lens dose in interventional radiology staff of Guandong medical institutions from 2019 to 2023. Methods Employing a convenience sampling method, the lens dose and chest dose was monitored with TLD dosimeters in 34 level A tertiary medical institutions. The monitoring data were analyzed on the basis of a summary, and the relationship between the two was explored. Results A total of 1 033 interventional radiology staff were monitored. The ocular lens doses were in the range of (< MDL-26.12 mSv), M (P25, P75) was 0.03 (< MDL, 0.20) mSv. The doses < MDL, MDL-, 1.25 mSv-, 5 mSv-, 10 mSv-, 20 mSv- were monitored for 428, 543, 48, 5, 6, and 3 times, respectively, accounting for 41.43%, 52.57%, 4.65%, 0.48%, 0.58% and 0.29% of total monitoring times, respectively. The ocular lens doses each year was, seperately, in the range of (< MDL- 0.42) mSv, (< MDL- 4.95) mSv, (< MDL- 26.12) mSv, (< MDL- 10.66) mSv, (< MDL-5.41) mSv. M (P25, P75) were < MDL (< MDL, < MDL) mSv, < MDL (< MDL, 0.04) mSv, 0.06 (< MDL, 0.16) mSv, 0.04 (< MDL, 0.24) mSv, 0.08 (< MDL, 0.27) mSv, respectively. The eye lens doses to the staff involved in neural intervention, cardiovascular intervention, digestive intervention, tumor intervention, peripheral vascular intervention and comprehensive intervention was (< MDL-3.85) mSv, (< MDL-13.77) mSv, (< MDL-1.38) mSv, (< MDL-1.24) mSv, (< MDL-4.54) mSv, (< MDL-26.12) mSv. Dose M (P25, P75) were 0.05 (< MDL, 0.16) mSv, 0.07 (< MDL, 0.28) mSv, 0.04 (< MDL, 0.09) mSv, 0.03 (< MDL, 0.03) mSv, < MDL (< MDL, 0.07) mSv, and 0.05 (< MDL, 0.32) mSv. The difference of ocular lens dose in staff among different interventional procedures was statistically significant (H = 49.85, P < 0.01). The higher doses were observed in staff in cardiovascular interventional radiology and comprehensive intervention. The lower doses were received by staff involved in tumor interventional procedures. The correlation between eye lens and chest dose were significant, as showm by spearman correlation test (R = 0.37, P < 0.001). The corelation fitted by linear regression function follows the formula: eye lens dose = 1.044×chest dose. Conclusions The monitoring results of lens dose in interventional radiology staff are generally good. The doses received by staff vary work type and interventional procedure. The priority in improvement of radiological protection should be given to staff involved in cardiovascular intervention and comprehensive intervention. |
| HTML 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|