| 吴爱林,颜琳,武星蕾,等.AlignRT引导下保乳术后乳腺癌放疗摆位及患者胸廓特征参数影响研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2025,45(1):24-30.Wu Ailin,Yan Lin,Wu Xinglei,et al.Study on AlignRT guided set-up of breast-conserving radiotherapy and the impact of patients' thoracic characteristic parameters[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2025,45(1):24-30 |
| AlignRT引导下保乳术后乳腺癌放疗摆位及患者胸廓特征参数影响研究 |
| Study on AlignRT guided set-up of breast-conserving radiotherapy and the impact of patients' thoracic characteristic parameters |
| 投稿时间：2024-04-24 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20240424-00153 |
| 中文关键词: 乳腺癌 保乳放疗 体表光学引导放疗 摆位误差 胸廓特征参数 |
| 英文关键词:Breast cancer Breast-conserving radiotherapy Surface-guided radiation therapy Set-up error Thoracic characteristic parameters |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(11805198);中国科学技术大学附属第一医院院内基金(2022YJQN015) |
| 作者 | 单位 | E-mail | | 吴爱林 | 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区放疗科, 合肥 230031
安徽省肿瘤医院放疗科, 合肥 230031 | | | 颜琳 | 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区放疗科, 合肥 230031
安徽省肿瘤医院放疗科, 合肥 230031 | | | 武星蕾 | 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区放疗科, 合肥 230031
安徽省肿瘤医院放疗科, 合肥 230031 | | | 张朋 | 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区放疗科, 合肥 230031
安徽省肿瘤医院放疗科, 合肥 230031 | | | 程菁菁 | 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区放疗科, 合肥 230031
安徽省肿瘤医院放疗科, 合肥 230031 | | | 臧春宝 | 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区放疗科, 合肥 230031
安徽省肿瘤医院放疗科, 合肥 230031 | | | 张洪波 | 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区放疗科, 合肥 230031
安徽省肿瘤医院放疗科, 合肥 230031 | | | 吴爱东 | 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区放疗科, 合肥 230031
安徽省肿瘤医院放疗科, 合肥 230031 | flkaidongwu@163.com |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1612 |
| 全文下载次数: 732 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 比较AlignRT光学引导方法与传统标记线方法对摆位精度的影响,探究患者胸廓特征参数对光学引导摆位精度的影响。方法 回顾性选择2022年7月至2023年9月在安徽省肿瘤医院接受保乳术后放疗的60例乳腺癌患者病例资料,根据摆位方式平均分为传统十字线摆位(标记线组)和体表光学引导放疗(SGRT)摆位(SGRT组),每组30例。以锥束CT扫描结果为金标准,对比分析两组三维摆位误差及临床靶体积-计划靶体积(CTV-PTV)靶区外放边界。定义多组患者胸廓特征参数,分析各胸廓特征参数SGRT摆位误差的相关性。结果 SGRT组和标记线组的三维方向摆位误差均值分别在0.2和0.5 cm以内,且两组三维方向摆位误差及总位移的差异具有统计学意义(z=-2.93、-3.22、-2.59、-4.76,P<0.05);SGRT组将CTV-PTV靶区外扩边界由传统标记法的0.5 cm缩小至0.3 cm;胸廓纵横比H/W、患侧夹角α1、健侧夹角α2与x方向摆位误差呈正相关(r=0.49、0.59、0.71,P<0.05);而患侧及健侧乳腺高度D1、D2与z方向摆位误差呈负相关(r=-0.46、-0.49,P<0.05)。结论 对于保乳术后放疗患者,SGRT能获得比传统标记线方法更精确的放疗摆位,可以有效缩小靶区外扩范围。同时,SGRT监测精度受患者胸廓特征参数影响,临床中需重点关注体型偏厚、体宽偏窄以及乳腺腺体偏小的保乳放疗患者。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To compare the impact of the AlignRT-based optical guidance method with the traditional marker line method on the accuracy of positioning, and explore the effect of patient's different thoracic characteristic parameters on the precision of optical guidance positioning. Methods A total of sixty breast cancer patients who received post breast-conserving radiotherapy at Anhui Cancer Hospital from July 2022 to September 2023 were retrospectively selected. Then these patients were equally divided into traditional cross hairs set-up (marker line group) and surface-guided set-up (SGRT group). The cone-beam CT scanning results were used as the gold standard, the three-dimensional set-up errors and the CTV-PTV target area external radiotherapy boundaries of two groups were studied comparatively. Multiple patient's thoracic characteristic parameters were defined and the correction between each parameter and set-up error of SGRT was analyzed. Results The mean value of three-dimensional set-up errors in the SGRT group and the marker line group was within 0.2 cm and 0.5 cm, respectively. The differences in three-dimensional set-up errors and total displacements between two groups were statistically significant (z = -2.93, -3.21, -2.59, -4.76, P < 0.05). The SGRT group reduced the CTV-PTV boundary from 0.5cm of conventional marker line group to 0.3 cm. The thoracic aspect ratio H/W, the affected side pinch angle α1, and the healthy side pinch angle α2 were positively correlated with the x-direction posing error (r = 0.49, 0.59, 0.71, P<0.05); whereas, the affected side and the healthy side mammary gland heights D1 and D2 were negatively correlated with the z-direction posing error (r = -0.46, -0.49, P<0.05). Conclusions For breast-conserving postoperative radiotherapy patients, SGRT can obtain a more accurate radiotherapy set-up than the traditional marker line method, and can effectively reduce the target area externally expanded range. Meanwhile, the monitoring accuracy of SGRT is affected by the patient's thoracic characteristic parameters, and clinical attention should be paid to breast-conserving radiotherapy patients with thick body shape, narrow body width, and small breast glands. |
| HTML 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|