王佳浩,谢洪玲,赵亚东,等.基于光学体表监测的左侧乳腺癌深吸气屏气放疗实时三维在体剂量验证分析[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2024,44(6):517-522.Wang Jiahao,Xie Hongling,Zhao Yadong,et al.Optical surface monitoring-based real-time 3D in vivo dose verification for patients with left breast cancer undergoing deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2024,44(6):517-522 |
基于光学体表监测的左侧乳腺癌深吸气屏气放疗实时三维在体剂量验证分析 |
Optical surface monitoring-based real-time 3D in vivo dose verification for patients with left breast cancer undergoing deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy |
投稿时间:2024-01-09 |
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20240109-00011 |
中文关键词: 左侧乳腺癌 深吸气屏气门控放疗 三维在体剂量验证 γ通过率 |
英文关键词:Left breast cancer Deep inspiration breath-hold surface guided radiation therapy 3D in vivo dose verification γ pass rate |
基金项目:浙江省基础公益研究计划(ZCLTGY24H1602) |
|
摘要点击次数: 605 |
全文下载次数: 214 |
中文摘要: |
目的 对光学体表监测下的左侧乳腺癌深吸气屏气门控放疗(DIBH-SGRT)患者进行三维在体剂量验证,研究靶区剂量学差异以及影响通过率指标的相关因素。方法 选取浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院放疗科行DIBH-SGRT的20例左侧乳腺癌患者,记录光学体表监测下患者DIBH过程中的分次内位移偏差,同时所有患者在治疗过程中均进行基于电子射野影像装置的三维在体剂量(EIVD)验证,统计2 mm/2%、3 mm/3%与3 mm/5%的3类γ通过率。以剂量体积直方图(DVH)参数,评估肿瘤靶区与危及器官的剂量学差异。采用Pearson相关性分析,计算3类γ通过率与剂量学差异、位移偏差间的相关性。结果 2 mm/2%、3 mm/3%和3 mm/5%的平均γ通过率分别为73.43%、86.00%和92.96%,EIVD测量剂量与计划剂量在计划瘤床靶区体积 (PTV_TB)和计划靶区体积(PTV)Dmean 的平均剂量偏差为0.23%和0.59%(P>0.05)。Pearson分析显示,γ通过率与肿瘤靶区的剂量学差异相关性较弱(R<0.7),与分次内DIBH的左右(Lat)方向和升降(Vert)方向位移偏差相关性较强(R>0.7)。结论 三维EIVD验证能够有效保证左侧乳腺癌DIBH-SGRT过程中肿瘤靶区剂量传递的精准性,同时EIVD系统能够潜在发现患者屏气过程中的位移偏差。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To perform optical surface monitoring-based three-dimensional (3D) in vivo dose verification for patients with left breast cancer undergoing deep inspiration breath-hold surface-guided radiation therapy (DIBH-SGRT) and to investigate the dosimetric differences in the target volumes and related factors affecting γ pass rates. Methods Totally 20 patients with left breast cancer who received DIBH-SGRT at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University were selected. The optical surface monitoring-based intrafractional displacement deviations of the patients during DIBH were recorded. Meanwhile, electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based in vivo dosimetry (EIVD) verification was performed for patients during the DIBH-SGRT, and γ pass rates were measured with the criteria of 2 mm/2%, 3 mm/3%, and 3 mm/5%. The dosimetric differences between planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed based on dose-volume histograms (DVHs). Furthermore, Pearson correlation analysis was employed to determine the correlation of three γ pass rates with dosimetric differences and displacement deviations. Results The average pass rates with the criteria of 2 mm/2%, 3 mm/3%, and 3 mm/5% were determined at 73. 43%, 86. 00%, and 92. 96%, respectively, and the average deviations between EIVD measured doses and planned doses in PTV_TB and PTV Dmean were proved to be 0.23% and 0.59%, respectively (P>0. 05). Pearson analysis revealed that the γ pass rates exhibited a weak correlation with dosimetric differences in PTVs(R<0.7) but strong correlations with intrafractional displacement deviations in Lat and Vert directions during DIBH (P>0. 7). Conclusions EIVD verification can ensure the high accuracy of dose delivery in PTVs during DIBH-SGRT for left breast cancer. Additionally, the EIVD verification system has the potential to detect displacement deviations during breath holding. |
HTML 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|