倪茵,胡晓燕,胡岚萍,罗娜娜,邱大胜.呋塞米介入对18 F-脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射计算机断层显像的放射防护作用[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2022,42(12):980-983
呋塞米介入对18 F-脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射计算机断层显像的放射防护作用
Radiation protection effect of furosemide intervention on 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging
投稿时间:2022-03-09  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20220309-00089
中文关键词:  18氟-脱氧葡萄糖|正电子发射计算机断层显像|呋塞米|周围剂量当量率
英文关键词:18F-2-deoxy-D-glucose|Positron emission tomography/computed tomography Furosemide|Peripheral dose equivalence rate
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
倪茵 湖北省肿瘤医院核医学科, 武汉 430079  
胡晓燕 湖北省肿瘤医院核医学科, 武汉 430079  
胡岚萍 湖北省肿瘤医院核医学科, 武汉 430079  
罗娜娜 湖北省肿瘤医院核医学科, 武汉 430079  
邱大胜 湖北省肿瘤医院核医学科, 武汉 430079 hbpetct@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 1221
全文下载次数: 471
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨呋塞米介入18F-脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)正电子发射计算机断层显像(PET/CT)的放射防护作用。方法 146例患者按随机数表法随机分为两组,实验组74例,对照组72例。试验组注射前口服呋塞米40 mg,正常对照组未行特殊处理,18F-FDG注射60、120 min后,分别在其正面前胸、腹水平测量0.5 m处周围剂量当量率。结果 试验组注射18F-FDG后60 min胸部及腹部、120 min胸部及腹部的周围剂量当量率分别为(30.80±8.61)、(41.38±11.06)、(18.26±4.85)和(24.66±6.50)μSv/h,均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=15.36、13.13、18.73、17.29,P<0.05)。试验组和对照组的纵隔SUVmax、肝脏SUVmax差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素分析显示,是否服用速尿、体表面积是影响周围剂量当量率的主要影响因素(t=-13.52、2.96,P<0.05),年龄、性别对周围剂量当量率的影响不明显(P>0.05)。结论 呋塞米介入可促进排尿,在不影响影像质量的前提下有效降低了受检者的体内辐射,有较好的放射防护作用。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the radiation protection effect of furosemide intervention on 18F-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT)imaging.Methods A total of 146 patients were randomly divided into two groups, with test group of 74 patients and control group of 72. The test group was administrated orally with furosemide of 40 mg for each one before injection, while the normal control group did not undergo special treatment. 60 and 120 min after 18F-FDG injection, the horizontal measurement of ambient dose equivalent rates was carried out at 0.5 m from the front of both chest and abdomen respectively.Results For the test group, the ambient dose equivalent rates were measured to be (30.80±8.61) and (41.38±11.06) μSv/h 60 min after injection of 18F-FDG whereas (18.26±4.85) and (24.66±6.50)μSv/h 120 min after injection, respectively, both lower than in the control group and with statistically significant difference between the both (t =15.36,13.13,18.73,17.29, P<0.05). No significant difference was found between mediastinal SUVmax and liver SUVmax in the experimental group and control group (P>0.05). Multivariate ANOVA showed that body surface area was a major factor influencing ambient dose equivalent rate regardless of furosemide injection(t=-13.52,2.96, P<0.05), and no obvious effects of age and sex on ambient dose equivalence rate were found.Conclusions Furosemide intervention can promote urination, effectively reduce the internal radiation exposure of the examinated patietns in the premise of not affecting the image quality, and therefore provide a better radiation protection effect.
HTML  查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭