孙彦泽,钱建军,田野.国内放射生物学研究中物理剂量报告规范性现状调查[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2022,42(10):812-816
国内放射生物学研究中物理剂量报告规范性现状调查
Current situation investigation on the standardization of physical dose description in radiobiology researches in China
投稿时间:2022-07-08  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20220708-00283
中文关键词:  放射生物学  物理剂量学  可再现性  规范性
英文关键词:Radiobiology  Physical dosimetry  Reproducibility  Normalization
基金项目:苏州市放射治疗学临床医学中心项目(Szlcyxzx202103)
作者单位E-mail
孙彦泽 苏州大学附属第二医院放疗科 苏州大学放射肿瘤治疗学研究所 苏州市肿瘤放射治疗学重点实验室, 苏州 215004  
钱建军 苏州大学附属第二医院放疗科 苏州大学放射肿瘤治疗学研究所 苏州市肿瘤放射治疗学重点实验室, 苏州 215004 qianjianjun0628@aliyun.com 
田野 苏州大学附属第二医院放疗科 苏州大学放射肿瘤治疗学研究所 苏州市肿瘤放射治疗学重点实验室, 苏州 215004  
摘要点击次数: 1269
全文下载次数: 511
中文摘要:
      目的 通过文献调查,了解国内放射生物学研究中物理剂量参数的规范性现状。方法 调查国内两本重要的学术期刊——《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》和《中华放射医学与防护杂志》近5年发表的放射生物学论文,针对物理剂量学参数,按照美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)和Desrosiers等推荐的评分系统对其书写的规范性进行评分(满分10分)。结果 两本杂志共纳入222篇文献,中位得分为5.0分。其中,有72.1%的文献得分为4.0~7.0分,有68.0%的文献得分≤5.5分,另有18.5%得分≤3.0分。有90.1%和97.7%的文献分别描述了"射线类型"、"吸收剂量",平均得分最高(0.90和0.98分),"剂量学校准"平均得分最低(0分)。结论 尽管绝大多数文献都描述了"射线类型"和"吸收剂量",但大多数其他细节未被报告。这表明在国内放射生物学研究中物理剂量学报告的规范性存在缺陷,预计可能影响研究结果的可再现性和可解释性,应被重视。
英文摘要:
      Objective To understand the normative status of physical dose description in domestic radiobiology studies through literature study.Methods According to the scoring system recommended by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Desrosiers et al, evaluate (full Score: 10 points) the normalization of physical dosimetry description in the radiobiology-related articles published in two important journals, Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology and Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, in past 5 years.Results A total of 222 relevant articles from these two journals were included, and a median score of 5.0 was evaluated. Among them, 72.1% of the literatures scored 4.0-7.0 points, 68.0% of the literatures scored ≤5.5 points, and 18.5% scored ≤3.0 points. 90.1% and 97.7% of the literatures described "the type of ray" and "absorbed dose", with the highest average score (0.90 and 0.98 points) respectively. The lowest average score of "dosimetry calibration" was 0 point. Conclusions Although the most of literatures described "the type of ray" and "absorbed dose", most other details of dosimetric parameters were not reported. Therefore, there is a deficiency in the standardized description of physical dosimetry in domestic radiobiology literatures, which may affect the reproducibility and interpretability of research result.
HTML  查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭