中华放射医学与防护杂志

陈亚正,袁佳薇,梁丽华,等.半铅门技术在口咽癌调强治疗计划中的剂量学研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2018,38(12):918-922.Chen Yazheng,Yuan Jiawei,Liang Lihua,et al.A dosimetric study of half jaw technique applied in the treatment planning for oropharyngeal cancer patients[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2018,38(12):918-922

半铅门技术在口咽癌调强治疗计划中的剂量学研究

A dosimetric study of half jaw technique applied in the treatment planning for oropharyngeal cancer patients

投稿时间：2018-04-27

DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2018.12.007

中文关键词: 半铅门容积旋转调强口咽癌剂量

英文关键词:Half jaw Volumetric modulated arc therapy Oropharyngeal cancer Dose

基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0113100）

作者	单位
陈亚正	610041 成都, 四川省肿瘤医院放疗中心
袁佳薇	621000 绵阳, 四川省科学城医院肿瘤科
梁丽华	610041 成都, 四川省肿瘤医院放疗中心
徐鹏	610041 成都, 四川省肿瘤医院放疗中心
吴骏翔	610041 成都, 四川省肿瘤医院放疗中心
黎杰	610041 成都, 四川省肿瘤医院放疗中心
廖雄飞	610041 成都, 四川省肿瘤医院放疗中心
王培	610041 成都, 四川省肿瘤医院放疗中心

摘要点击次数: 3415

全文下载次数: 1712

中文摘要:

目的研究半铅门容积旋转调强计划（H-VMAT）应用于口咽癌时的剂量优势，与全铅门容积旋转调强计划（W-VMAT），固定野调强计划（IMRT）进行比较。方法选取10例口咽癌患者CT图像传至Eclipse11.0（美国Varian公司）治疗计划系统行H-VMAT、W-VMAT和IMRT。两种VMAT计划均采用双弧360℃照射，IMRT计划采用7野均分。3种调强计划的通量优化条件一样。统计靶区PGTV、PCTV1、PCTV2、PGTVln、PCTVln的D₂、D₉₈、D₅₀、均匀性指数（HI）、适形指数（CI）；脑干、脊髓的D_{1 cc}；腮腺、口腔、喉的平均剂量D_mean，颈部正常组织D_mean，跳数（MU）以及其他剂量学参数。结果 3种调强计划方式之间比较，H-VAMT计划改善了靶区的HI、CI（靶区PCTV2除外），差异具有统计学意义（HI：F=3.959、6.764、10.581、6.770、13.040，P<0.05；CI：F=6.594、4.138、0.842、4.031、5.388，P<0.05），同时明显降低了脑干、脊髓的D_max（F=4.509、20.331，P<0.05）和D_{1 cc}（F=27.432、26.314，P<0.05），减少了口腔、喉以及颈部正常组织的D_mean（F=4.279、29.498、19.295，P<0.05），其中口腔、喉的V_50%在IMRT中略低（F=8.140，P<0.05）。IMRT对口腔、喉的保护略优于W-VMAT，但剂量分布最差。H-VMAT计划在颈部正常组织以及下颈，背部的剂量分布最优，IMRT则存在高剂量曲线。结论口咽癌容积旋转调强计划采用半铅门技术优于全铅门W-VMAT、固定野IMRT计划，可以考虑临床实践。

英文摘要:

Objective To investigate the potential dosimetric advantages of half jaw volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) applied to the Oropharyngeal Cancer, comparing with full jaw VMAT (F-VMAT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods Planning CT images of 10 oropharyngeal cancer patients were retrospectively chosen and transferred to Eclipse treatment planning system v.11.0 (Varian Medical Systems, Pala Alto, USA), based on which H-VMAT, W-VMAT, and IMRT plans were created. Two full arcs (360°) were adopted for VMAT planning, and the 7 beams were equally distributed for IMRT planning. The optimization constraints remained the same for the three kinds of plans. The dosimetric parameters such as D₂, D₉₈, D₅₀, HI, and CI were evaluated for PGTV, PCTV1, PCTV2, PGTVln, and PCTVln. In addition, the maximum dose (D_max) and D_{1 cc} (minimum dose received by 1cc) of the brainstem and spinal cord were analyzed respectively. The mean dose (D_mean) to the parotids, oral cave, larynx, and cervical normal tissues were also reviewed. The monitor units (MU) for all treatment plans were recorded.Results Comparisons of the three planning techniques showed that H-VAMT improved the HI and CI of the targets (except PCTV2) significantly (HI:F=3.959, 6.764, 10.581, 6.770, 13.040, P<0.05; CI:F=6.594, 4.138, 0.842, 4.031, 5.388, P<0.05); reduced D_max (F=4.509, 20.331, P<0.05) and D_{1 cc} for brainstem and spinal cord (F=27.432, 26.314, P<0.05) significantly; reduced D_mean (F=4.279, 29.498, 19.295, P<0.05) to the normal tissues of the mouth, throat and neck significantly. The V₅₀ of the mouth and throat were slightly lower in IMRT plans (F=8.140, P<0.05). IMRT was slightly better than W-VMAT in sparing oral cavity and larynx, but the dose distribution was the worst. The H-VMAT plans showed the best dose distribution in the cervical normal tissues, especially for the lower and posterior parts, where IMRT plans displayed high dose curves.Conclusions H-VMAT is dosimetrically superior than W-VMAT and IMRT for oropharyngeal cancer, which could be considered for clinical applications.

HTML 查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭