| 郑亚琴,崔桐,郑旭亮,等.Varian加速器不同的射野形成方式对射野剂量学参数的影响[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2017,37(9):709-712.Zheng Yaqin,Cui Tong,Zheng Xuliang,et al.Influences of various field-defining methods of Varian accelerator on radiation dosimetry parameters[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2017,37(9):709-712 |
| Varian加速器不同的射野形成方式对射野剂量学参数的影响 |
| Influences of various field-defining methods of Varian accelerator on radiation dosimetry parameters |
| 投稿时间：2017-03-09 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2017.09.014 |
| 中文关键词: 射野形成方式 调强放疗 剂量学 |
| 英文关键词:Field defining method Intensity modulated radiotherapy Dosimetry |
| 基金项目:山西省卫生计生委科研课题资助（2015057）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3572 |
| 全文下载次数: 2680 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 探讨Varian加速器不同射野形成方式对射野剂量学参数的影响，为治疗计划系统（TPS）数据建模提供理论依据。方法 在准直器（JAW）、多叶光栅（MLC）和准直器跟随多叶光栅（JAW+MLC）3种射野的形成方式下，分别测量百分深度剂量（PDD）、射野离轴量（OAR）及射野总散射因子（Scp），并对实测数据进行分析比较。结果 3种射野形成方式对中心轴的百分深度剂量影响很小；在加速器的左右方向和枪靶方向，MLC形成的射野均较JAW形成射野大，在左右方向最大可达2.9 mm。在枪靶方向，最大可达1.7 mm。在左右方向MLC形成的射野测量曲线的半影较在相同射野大小JAW形成射野的半影大。在枪靶方向MLC形成的射野测量曲线的半影较在相同射野大小JAW形成射野的半影小。在两个方向 JAW+MLC形成射野与JAW形成射野大小与半影均无明显差异。结论 射野的不同形成方式对射野大小、半影、总散射因子有影响，建议做调强放射治疗（IMRT）时，在TPS数据建模过程中，应对MLC射野的剂量参数进行关注。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To evaluate the influences of various field-defining method of Varian accelerator on radiation dosimetry parameters, and provide theoretical basis for the beam modeling of the treatment planning system (TPS).Methods The percentage depth dose (PDD), the off-axis ratio (OAR) and the total scattering factors (Scp) of radiation fields were measured in three different conditions, including collimators (JAW), multileaf collimator(MLC) and JAW+MLC. The measured data was analyzed and compared with each other.Results The PDD of central axis was marginally influenced by three field-defining method. In both directions, the MLC-defined field sizes were larger by a maximum of 2.9 mm (left-right) or 1.7 mm (gun-target) than the JAW-defined ones. In the left-right direction, the width of field penumbra shaped by MLC was larger than the field of the same size as defined by JAW. The result of gun-target direction was to the contrary. In both directions, the field penumbra and size displayed no significant differences as defined by JAW+MLC or JAW.Conclusions The field size, penumbra width, and the total scattering factors were influenced by field-defining method, which indicates that special attention should be paid to the dosimetric parameters of MLC during TPS beam modeling for IMRT planning. |
| HTML 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|