中华放射医学与防护杂志

邓春兰,许顺良,肖圣祥,等.迭代重建技术在低剂量肾动脉CT血管造影检查中的应用[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2014,34(3):228-230.Deng Chunlan,Xu Shunliang,Xiao Shengxiang,et al.The use of iterative reconstruction technique in low-dose CT angiography of renal artery[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2014,34(3):228-230

迭代重建技术在低剂量肾动脉CT血管造影检查中的应用

The use of iterative reconstruction technique in low-dose CT angiography of renal artery

投稿时间：2013-12-09

DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2014.03.018

中文关键词: 肾动脉低剂量迭代重建体层摄影术,X射线计算机

英文关键词:Renal artery Low-dose Iterative reconstruction Tomography,X-ray computer

基金项目:

作者	单位	E-mail
邓春兰	310003 杭州, 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院放射科
许顺良	310003 杭州, 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院放射科
肖圣祥	310003 杭州, 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院放射科	cn@139.com
杨虹	310003 杭州, 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院放射科
冯湛	310003 杭州, 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院放射科

摘要点击次数: 5156

全文下载次数: 3242

中文摘要:

目的迭代重建技术（iDose⁴）在低剂量肾动脉CT血管造影检查（CTA）中应用的可行性研究。方法选取拟行肾动脉CT血管造影检查且体重在60~70 kg的患者90例，按检查先后分为，120 kV，120 mAs组（A组）；120kV，60 mAs组（B组）和100 kV，100 mAs组（C组），每组30例。其中A组采用滤波反投影法（FPB）生成图像，B组与C组采用iDose⁴迭代重建算法生成图像。测量记录各组图像的肾动脉CT值、噪声、信噪比（SNR）及对比噪声比（CNR）。对采集后的图像进行容积再现三维成像（VR）后处理，并按1~5分对VR图像质量进行评定。结果 A组与B组肾动脉CT值、SD值、SNR、CNR及VR图像质量评分差异无统计学意义；C组的SD值与A组、B组相当，而肾动脉CT值、SNR、CNR及VR图像质量评分均明显高于A组和B组，两组差异有统计学意义（t_CT值=-12.326，t_SNR=-7.136，t_CNR=-7.649；Z_VR=-2.690，P_VR <0.05）。结论肾动脉CTA运用iDose⁴迭代重建技术，在mAs降低50%的情况下仍能保证图像质量，而在管电压降低到100 kVp，辐射剂量（机器显示）降低50%的情况下，图像质量反而有所提高。

英文摘要:

Objective To assess the feasibility of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in renal artery using the iterative reconstruction technique(iDose⁴) in Brilliance iCT (Philips Ltd.). Methods 90 patients (body weight 60-70 kg) supposed to undergo renal artery CTA were selected and randomly divided into three groups: A(120 kV, 120 mAs), B(120 kV, 60 mAs) and C(100 kV, 100 mAs). CTA images from Group A were obtained using filtered back projection and those from the rest groups were generated by iDose⁴. Then CT number of renal artery, noise (denoted as standard deviation SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of images for each group were measured and recorded. Images were post-processed using volume reformation (VR) 3D imaging and image quality were assessed in five-level grade (1-5). Results The five parameters (CT number of renal artery, SD value, SNR, CNR and VR grade) of group A and group B were statistically insignificant (P>0.05). While SD values of group C were comparable to those of group A and B, the rest four parameters of group C were apparently larger, which was statistically significant (t_{CT value}=-12.326,t_SNR=-7.136,t_CNR=-7.649,Z_VR=-2.690,P_VR<0.05).Conclusions Image quality could still fit the diagnosis requirements using iDose⁴ when mAs decreased lower than 50%. The image quality increases when radiation dose is halved at 100 kVp kV.

HTML 查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭