方冬,袁宪顺,张东升.Implagraphy牙颌面锥形束CT不同扫描体位的辐射剂量对比研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2012,32(5):535-538
Implagraphy牙颌面锥形束CT不同扫描体位的辐射剂量对比研究
Dose comparison of different scan projections of Implagraphy cone beam computed tomography for dental maxillofacial use
投稿时间:2011-10-17  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2012.05.025
中文关键词:  锥形束CT  吸收剂量  当量剂量  有效剂量
英文关键词:Cone beam computed tomography  Absorbed dosage  Equivalent dosage  Effective dosage
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
方冬 250021 济南, 山东大学附属省立医院口腔医学中心  
袁宪顺 250021 济南, 山东大学附属省立医院医学影像科  
张东升 250021 济南, 山东大学附属省立医院口腔医学中心 ds63zhang@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 2859
全文下载次数: 2197
中文摘要:
      目的 测算Implagraphy牙颌面锥形束CT(CBCT)体模不同扫描体位的组织器官吸收剂量、当量剂量及有效剂量,为相应的防护措施提供客观依据。方法 使用仿真成年男性头颈部体模及热释光剂量计,分别测量Implagraphy CBCT下颌、上颌及颞下颌关节(TMJ)扫描时脑垂体、眼晶状体、腮腺、颌下腺、舌下腺、颅骨板障、下颌松质骨、颈椎松质骨、颊部皮肤、颈部皮肤、甲状腺、食管及口腔黏膜等组织器官的吸收剂量,计算眼晶状体、皮肤的当量剂量,及Implagraphy CBCT不同扫描体位的有效剂量E1990E2007结果 Implagraphy CBCT各扫描体位的吸收剂量分别为:下颌扫描(0.99±0.09)~(12.85±0.09)mGy,上颌扫描(0.93±0.01)~(13.07±0.02)mGy,TMJ扫描(0.68±0.01)~(10.18±0.04)mGy,相同组织器官在不同扫描体位的吸收剂量的差异具有统计学意义(F=19.61~30992.27,P<0.05)。在不同扫描体位,眼晶状体及皮肤的当量剂量分别为(1.11±0.07)~(5.76±0.06)mSv和(6.96±0.06)~(10.64±0.07)mSv,差异具有统计学意义(F=4473.02、9385.50,P<0.05)。有效剂量E1990E2007分别为:下颌扫描(191.35±1.53)和(325.17±2.58)μSv,上颌扫描(106.62±2.17)和(226.28±2.81)μSv,TMJ扫描(104.21±1.02)和(142.36±1.90)μSv。结论 在牙颌面CBCT检查过程中,采用尽可能小的扫描视野、准确地扫描体位,正确使用铅胶帽、围领及防护镜等屏蔽措施,使X射线辐射照射保持在可以合理达到的尽可能低的水平。
英文摘要:
      Objective To evaluate the subject's absorbed dose, equivalent dose and effective dose.Methods The CBCT unit was Implagraphy and three scan projections were selected such as mandible, maxilla and temporamandibular joint(TMJ). Thermoluminescent dosimeter tubes were used to record the absorbed dose at special positions in the head and neck region of an adult skull and tissue-equivalent phantom. 16 interested organs included pituitary, lens, parotid glands, submandibular glands, sublingual glands, diploe, spongy bone of the chin and cervical vertebra, skins of cheeks and nuchal region, thyroid and esophagus. The absorbed dose was measured in these organs, and then the effective dose(E1990, E2007) were calculated according to different ICRP tissue weighting factors. Results The absorbed dose of mandible, maxilla and TMJ scan varied from (0.99±0.09) to (12.85±0.09)mGy, (0.93±0.01) to (13.07±0.02)mGy and (0.68±0.01) to (10.18±0.04)mGy. There was significant difference among the three scan projections (F=19.61-30992.27, P<0.05).The equivalent doses of lens and skin were (1.11±0.07)-(5.76±0.06)mSv and (6.96±0.06)-(10.64±0.07) mSv. There was significant difference among the three scan projections (F=4473.02, 9385.50, P<0.05). The effective dose(E1990, E2007) was [(191.35±1.53), (325.17±2.58) μSv] for mandible scan, [(106.62±2.17),(226.28±2.81) μSv] for maxilla scan, [(104.21±1.02), (142.36±1.90) μSv] for TMJ scan,respectively. Conclusions The valid measurement should be taken to reduce the subject’s dose such as a careful history and clinical examination before the performance of CBCT, the latest risk/benefit assessment, precise scan position, the shielding of thyroid as well as brain and the smaller volume size as well.
HTML  查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭