戴婷婷,刘玉龙,李元,廖海红,邱梦悦,卞华慧,陈炜博,刘春风.核电厂操纵人员心理健康相关因子的初步研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2012,32(2):209-212
核电厂操纵人员心理健康相关因子的初步研究
A preliminary study on related factors of mental health in nuclear power plant operators
投稿时间:2010-09-14  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2012.02.026
中文关键词:  核电厂|操纵人员|心理健康
英文关键词:Nuclear power plant|Operators|Mental health
基金项目:江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助; 江苏省"十二五"临床医学重点学科资助
作者单位E-mail
戴婷婷 215004 苏州大学附属第二医院应急中心  
刘玉龙 215004 苏州大学附属第二医院应急中心 yulongliu2002@126.com 
李元 215004 苏州大学附属第二医院应急中心  
廖海红 215004 苏州大学附属第二医院应急中心  
邱梦悦 215004 苏州大学附属第二医院应急中心  
卞华慧 215004 苏州大学附属第二医院应急中心  
陈炜博 215004 苏州大学附属第二医院应急中心  
刘春风 215004 苏州大学附属第二医院应急中心  
摘要点击次数: 3606
全文下载次数: 2253
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨核电厂操纵人员的心理健康状况,及其与安定性、活泼性、焦虑性、紧迫性因子的相关性。方法 采用整群随机取样法,抽取3个核电基地255名男性操纵人员作为研究对象,以61名某高校四年级男性学生作为对照,应用苏州大学附属第二医院自主研发的《中国核电厂操纵人员心理健康和神经行为测评系统》对受试者进行心理健康测试,记录心理健康人格因素及4项主要人格因素(安定性、活泼性、焦虑性、紧迫性)的得分。结果 掩饰性因子得分均<8分,表示测试结果可信。操纵人员心理不佳者占1.57%(4/255),欠佳者占3.92%(10/255),一般者占27.84%(71/255),优良者占66.7%(170/255),而对照组心理不佳者占9.84%(6/61)。操纵人员在心理健康人格因素、安定性、焦虑性、紧迫性因子得分上与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=3.437、4.423、-2.493和-2.093,P<0.05)。27岁以上组及工龄5年以上组在焦虑性、紧迫性、心理健康人格因素、安定性因子得分上与27岁以下组及工龄5年以下组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=-3.407、-2.138、2.585和2.349;t=-2.941、-2.256、2.606和2.947,P<0.05)。心理健康与安定性、活泼性呈正相关(r =0.721、0.650,P<0.05),与焦虑性、紧迫性呈负相关(r =-0.809、-0.693,P<0.05)。结论 中国核电厂操纵人员大多数处于良好的心理健康状态,但应重视不同年龄和工龄人员的心理健康。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the status of nuclear power plant operators in mental health and its correlation with emotional stability, liveliness, anxiety and urgency. Methods 255 male operators were randomly selected from three nuclear power bases, meanwhile 61 undergraduates were used as control group. The mental health and neurobehavioral evaluation system of Chinese nuclear power plant operators was developed by Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,which was used to assess mental health of the subjects. The scores of mental health personality factors were recorded, together with four main personality factors including emotional stability, liveliness, anxiety and urgency. Results The score of lie was lower than 8 which showed all inspected groups were normal. 1.57% (4/255) operators had psychological disorders, 3.92% (10/255) had poor mental health, 27.84% (71/255) had general mental health, 66.7% (170/255) had excellent mental health, whereas 9.84%(6/61)for control group had psychological disorders. Obvious difference was observed in the final scores between the nuclear power plant operators and control group. The former gained higher scores on mental health, emotional stability, and lower scores on anxiety and urgency(t=3.437,4.423,-2.493,-2.093,P<0.05). Both groups aged over 27 years and with length of service over 5 years were awarded higher scores on mental health, emotional stability(t=2.585, 2.349; t=2.606,2.947, P<0.05), lower scores on anxiety and urgency(t=-3.407,-2.138; t=-2.941, -2.256, P<0.05). The mental health was positively correlated with emotional stability and liveliness(r =0.721,0.650,P<0.05), but negatively correlated with anxiety and urgency(r =-0.809,-0.693, P<0.05). Conclusions The majority of nuclear power plant operators had excellent psychological quality, but some factors should be paid more attention, such as different ages and length of service time.
HTML  查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭