| 汪隽琦,李龙根,徐志勇,杨焕军,傅小龙.食管癌靶区剂量不均匀性提高在逆向调强计划中的应用[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2011,31(4):453-455 |
| 食管癌靶区剂量不均匀性提高在逆向调强计划中的应用 |
| Application of dose heterogeneity in the target volume in intensity-modulated radiation therapy of esophageal cancer |
| 投稿时间：2011-02-14 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2011.04.020 |
| 中文关键词: 食管癌 放射疗法 逆向调强放疗 剂量均匀性 肺剂量 |
| 英文关键词:Esophageal carcinoma Radiation therapy Intensity modulated radiation therapy Dose heterogeneity Lung dose |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4105 |
| 全文下载次数: 2291 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 探讨提高靶区剂量不均匀性在食管癌逆向调强计划中应用的优势。方法 10例食管癌患者中,95%体积的计划靶区(PTV)接受60 Gy处方剂量,脊髓最高剂量不超过45 Gy,分别为每例患者设计2套5野放疗计划。严格限制靶区最大剂量在63 Gy以内的调强计划(IMRThom)和放松靶区最大剂量的限制到69 Gy的调强计划(IMRTinhom)。根据剂量体积直方图比较PTV剂量和相关危及器官的受量差异。结果 与IMRThom相比,IMRTinhom增加了靶区最大剂量(t= -23.58,P=0.000)和不均匀指数(t= -11.06,P=0.000),同时提高了其最小剂量(t= -3.37,P=0.012)和平均剂量(t= -4.95,P= 0.002),降低了肺组织V5(t=6.96,P=0.000)、V10(t=5.24,P=0.001)、V15(t=4.73,P=0.002)、V20(t=8.08,P=0.000)、V25(t=8.58,P=0.000)及平均肺剂量(t= 7.28,P=0.000),两套计划心脏的平均剂量和脊髓的最大剂量比较差异均无统计学意义。结论 提高食管癌靶区剂量不均匀性的调强放疗计划,对于靶区的剂量递增及肺组织在低剂量照射区域的保护,更具有优势。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To investigate the advantage of the intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment (IMRT) by allowing dose heterogeneity in the target volume in esophageal cancer treatment planning. Methods Two sets of 5-field IMRT planning were designed for 10 esophageal cancer patients upon the condition of appropriate clinical tolerance level with the prescription dose of 60 Gy to 95% of the planned target volume (PTV) and the maximum dose of 45 Gy to the spinal cord: the IMRT with rigid restriction of the maximum homogeneous dose to the PTV within 63 Gy prescribing a homogeneous dose(IMRThom) and the IMRT allowing dose heterogeneity by loosening the constraints on maximum dose in the PTV to 69 Gy (IMRTinhom). Dosimetric comparison was conducted by using dose-volume histograms. Results Compared to IMRThom, the minimum dose (t= -3.37,P=0.012), maximum dose (t= -23.58,P=0.000), mean dose (t= -4.95,P=0.002), and heterogeneity index (t= -11.06,P=0.000) in PTV of the IMRTinhom were all significantly increased, and the values of V5(t=6.96,P=0.000), V10 (t=5.24,P=0.001), V15(t=4.73,P=0.002), V20(t=8.08,P=0.000), V25(t=8.58,P=0.000), and mean dose (t= 7.28,P=0.000) of the normal lungs were all significantly lower. There were no significant differences in all the indexes for the mean dose to the heart and maximum dose to the spinal cord between these 2 set of planning. Conclusions The IMRT plan allowing dose heterogeneity in the PTV escalates the prescription dose and decreases the doses to the lungs. |
| HTML 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|