| 周桂霞,戴相昆,徐寿平,等.乳腺癌术后放疗3种治疗计划的剂量学研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2010,30(3):314-316.ZHOU Gui-xia,DAI Xiang-kun,XU Shou-ping,et al.Dosimetric study of three different kinds of radiotherapy techniqueforpost-operativebreastcancer[J].Chin J Radiol Med Prot,2010,30(3):314-316 |
| 乳腺癌术后放疗3种治疗计划的剂量学研究 |
| Dosimetric study of three different kinds of radiotherapy techniqueforpost-operativebreastcancer |
| 投稿时间：2009-08-14 |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2010.03.022作者单位: 100853 北京,中国人民解放军总医院放射治疗科 |
| 中文关键词: 胸壁照射 螺旋断层治疗 调强放疗 三维适形放疗 |
| 英文关键词:Chest wall irradiation Helical tomotherapy Intensity-modulated radiation therapy Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4654 |
| 全文下载次数: 2678 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 评估螺旋断层调强放疗(helical tomotherapy,HT)、常规直线加速器逆向调强放疗(IMRT)和三维适形放疗(3D- CRT)3种治疗计划对乳腺癌术后胸壁照射的剂量影响和正常组织受照剂量体积对比。方法 选择10例早期乳腺癌改良根治术后患者CT定位图像,由同一医生勾画PTV,统一处方剂量50 Gy/ 25次。每例图像分别做HT、IMRT和3D- CRT 3种治疗计划,并对心脏、健侧肺和患侧肺受照射剂量体积、靶区适形度指数、剂量均匀指数和处方剂量所覆盖的靶体积等物理参数进行比较。结果 95%和100%的处方剂量覆盖的PTV体积在HT、IMRT和3D- CRT组分别为99.13%和95.87%、97.80%和94.05%、96.37%和87.29%。HT、IMRT 和3D-CRT组的适形指数和靶区均匀指数分别为0.80±0.10和1.09±0.03、0.65±0.07和1.14±0.02、0.40±0.08和1.17±0.04。心脏V5~V20以3D- CRT组最少,其次是HT组。患侧肺V5接受的照射剂量体积以3D- CRT组最小,与HT和IMRT两组相比差异均有统计学意义。健侧肺V5和V10以3D- CRT组最少。结论 乳腺癌术后胸壁照射的靶区适形度和剂量均匀指数HT组最好;心脏、健侧肺和患侧肺低剂量区最小的依次是3D-CRT、HT和IMRT组。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To investigate the dosimetric characteristics of helical tomotherapy (HT),intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D- CRT) for the post-operative breast cancer as well as their comparison in protecting the normal tissues.Methods The CT images of 10 postoperative patients with early stage breast cancer were transferRed into HT and IMRT and 3D- CRT planning system respectively after the target region and normal tissues were drawn out with the same doctor. Each prescribed dose for three kinds of plans was 50 Gy/25 fractions. Inrradiation doses and volume at heart and double lungs as well as conformity index(CI) and homogeneity index(HI) were evaluated.Results The PTV volume of prescribed target dose of 95% and 100% in HT, IMRT and 3D-CRT groups were 99.13% and 95.87%, 97.80% and 94.05%, 96.37% and 87.29%, respectively.The CI and HI in HT, IMRT and 3D- CRT groups were 0.80±0.10 and 1.09±0.03, 0.65±0.07 and 1.14±0.02, 0.40±0.08 and 1.17±0.04, respectively V5, V10and V20 of the heart were the lowest at 3D-CRT than HT and IMRT. V5 of the diseased lung was the lowest at 3D- CRT compared to HT and IMRT.V5 and V10of the healthy lung were the lowest at 3D-CRT compared to other groups.Conclusions Compared with IMRT and 3D- CRT, HT technique in treating breast cancer had the best conformity index and homogeneity index as well as steeper dose gradient. Irradiated doses and volume at the heart was the lowest at 3D- CRT and the highest at IMRT. Irradiated doses and volume of the heart and healthy lung as well as the diseased lung were the lowest at 3D- CRT compared to HT and IMRT groups. |
| HTML 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|